Jansen L M A, van Schaardenburg D, van der Horst-Bruinsma I E, Dijkmans B A C
Jan van Breemen Instituut, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Aug;61(8):700-3. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.8.700.
To identify variables that can predict a progressive outcome after one year of follow up in patients presenting with undifferentiated polyarthritis (UPA) at an early arthritis clinic.
New patients with arthritis in two or more joints of less than three years' duration were categorised at entry as UPA or as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on the clinical diagnosis of the rheumatologist. Outcome variables after one year were radiographic damage (Sharp/van der Heijde score) and functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire: HAQ score). A progressive disease at one year was defined as radiographic progression > or =4, or one year radiographic damage > or =10, or HAQ score > or =1. The baseline variables of patients with UPA with a progressive or mild outcome were compared.
280 patients (70% women; median age 56 years (range 18-90), median duration of symptoms 3.5 months) were included. 203 (72%) patients were clinically diagnosed as having RA and 77 (27%) as having UPA. The group of patients with progressive UPA (n=32 (42%)) had a significantly higher mean age, prevalence of arthritis of the hands, and disease activity (DAS28) at the first visit compared with the patients of the mild UPA group (n=45 (58%)). The RA group had significantly more frequent serum IgM-RF positivity, higher mean disease activity (DAS28) and mean C reactive protein concentration, more frequent symmetric arthritis, and arthritis in more than three joint groups than the progressive UPA group. Six (19%) of the progressive UPA group versus eight (4%) of the RA group did not receive disease modifying antirheumatic drugs during the first year.
After one year of follow up, 32 (42%) of the patients with UPA had a progressive disease. A progressive outcome was associated with older age, higher disease activity, and arthritis of the hands at baseline. To avoid undertreatment of patients with UPA, treatment should be based on severity rather than on diagnosis.
确定在早期关节炎诊所就诊的未分化多关节炎(UPA)患者随访一年后可预测病情进展结局的变量。
根据风湿病学家的临床诊断,将病程少于三年的两个或更多关节患有关节炎的新患者在入组时分类为UPA或类风湿关节炎(RA)。一年后的结局变量为放射学损伤(Sharp/van der Heijde评分)和功能状态(健康评估问卷:HAQ评分)。一年时疾病进展定义为放射学进展≥4,或一年放射学损伤≥10,或HAQ评分≥1。比较病情进展或轻微的UPA患者的基线变量。
纳入280例患者(70%为女性;中位年龄56岁(范围18 - 90岁),症状中位持续时间3.5个月)。203例(72%)患者临床诊断为RA,77例(27%)为UPA。与轻度UPA组患者(n = 45(58%))相比,病情进展的UPA组患者(n = 32(42%))初诊时平均年龄显著更高,手部关节炎患病率更高,疾病活动度(DAS28)更高。与病情进展的UPA组相比,RA组血清IgM-RF阳性更频繁,平均疾病活动度(DAS28)和平均C反应蛋白浓度更高,对称性关节炎更频繁,且三个以上关节组患有关节炎。病情进展的UPA组中有6例(19%)与RA组中的8例(4%)在第一年未接受改善病情抗风湿药物治疗。
随访一年后,32例(42%)UPA患者病情进展。病情进展结局与年龄较大、疾病活动度较高以及基线时手部关节炎有关。为避免对UPA患者治疗不足,治疗应基于病情严重程度而非诊断。