Takagaki M, McCarthy P M, Chung M, Connor J, Dessoffy R, Ochiai Y, Howard M, Doi K, Kopcak M, Mazgalev T N, Fukamachi K
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Heart. 2002 Aug;88(2):170-6. doi: 10.1136/heart.88.2.170.
Left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation is known to change in a beat to beat fashion, but there is no gold standard for contractility indices in atrial fibrillation, especially those measured non-invasively.
To determine whether the non-invasive index of contractility "preload-adjusted PWR(max)" (maximal ventricular power divided by the square of end diastolic volume) can accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat to beat fashion in atrial fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation was induced experimentally using 60 Hz stimulation of the atrium and maintained in 12 sheep; four received diltiazem, four digoxin, and four no drugs (control). Aortic flow, left ventricular volume, and left ventricular pressure were monitored simultaneously. Preload-adjusted PWR(max), the slope of the end systolic pressure-volume relation (E(max)), and the maximum rate of change of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt(max)) were calculated in a beat to beat fashion.
Preload-adjusted PWR(max) correlated linearly with load independent E(max) (p < 0.0001) and curvilinearly with load dependent dP/dt(max) (p < 0.0001), which suggested the load independence of preload-adjusted PWR(max). After five minutes of diltiazem administration, preload-adjusted PWR(max), dP/dt(max), and E(max) fell significantly (p < 0.0001) to 62%, 64%, and 61% of baseline, respectively. Changes were not significant after five minutes of digoxin (103%, 98%, and 102%) or in controls (97%, 96%, and 95%).
Preload-adjusted PWR(max) correlates linearly with E(max) and is a useful measure of contractility even in atrial fibrillation. Non-invasive application of this method, in combination with echocardiography and tonometry, may yield important information for optimising the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.
已知心房颤动时左心室收缩力会逐搏变化,但心房颤动收缩力指标尚无金标准,尤其是非侵入性测量指标。
确定收缩力非侵入性指标“预负荷调整的PWR(max)”(最大心室功率除以舒张末期容积的平方)能否在心房颤动时逐搏准确测量左心室收缩力。
通过60Hz心房刺激在12只绵羊中实验性诱发心房颤动并维持;4只给予地尔硫䓬,4只给予地高辛,4只不给予药物(对照组)。同时监测主动脉血流、左心室容积和左心室压力。逐搏计算预负荷调整的PWR(max)、收缩末期压力-容积关系斜率(E(max))和左心室压力最大变化率(dP/dt(max))。
预负荷调整的PWR(max)与负荷无关的E(max)呈线性相关(p<0.0001),与负荷相关的dP/dt(max)呈曲线相关(p<0.0001),这提示预负荷调整的PWR(max)具有负荷独立性。给予地尔硫䓬5分钟后,预负荷调整的PWR(max)、dP/dt(max)和E(max)显著下降(p<0.0001),分别降至基线的62%、64%和61%。给予地高辛5分钟后(分别为103%、98%和102%)及对照组(分别为97%、96%和95%)变化不显著。
预负荷调整的PWR(max)与E(max)呈线性相关,即使在心房颤动时也是一种有用的收缩力测量指标。该方法的非侵入性应用,结合超声心动图和张力测量法,可能为优化心房颤动患者的治疗提供重要信息。