Schenk Soren, Popović Zoran B, Ochiai Yoshie, Casas Fernando, McCarthy Patrick M, Starling Randall C, Kopcak Michael W, Dessoffy Raymond, Navia Jose L, Greenberg Neil L, Thomas James D, Fukamachi Kiyotaka
Dept. of Biomedical Engineering/ ND20, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Oct;287(4):H1632-40. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00123.2004. Epub 2004 May 20.
Right ventricular (RV) maximal power (PWR(mx)) is dependent on preload. The objective of this study was to test our hypothesis that the PWR(mx) versus end-diastolic volume (EDV) relationship, analogous to the load-independent stroke work (SW) versus EDV relationship (preload-recruitable SW, PRSW), is linear, with the PWR x-axis intercept (V(0PWR)) corresponding to the PRSW intercept (V(0SW)). If our hypothesis is correct, the preload sensitivity of PWR(mx) could be eliminated by adjusting for EDV and V(0PWR). Ten dogs were instrumented with a pulmonary flow probe, micromanometers, and RV conductance catheter. Data were obtained during bicaval occlusions under various conditions and fitted to PWR(mx) = a.(EDV - V(0PWR))(beta), where a is the slope of the relationship. The PWR(mx) versus EDV relationship did not deviate from linearity (beta = 1.09, P = not significant vs. 1), and V(0PWR) correlated with V(0SW) (r = 0.93, P <0.0001). V(0PRW) was related to steady-state EDV and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, allowing for estimation of V(0PWR) (V(0Est)) and single-beat PWR(mx) preload adjustment. Dividing PWR(mx) by the difference of EDV and V(0PWR) (PAMP(V0PWR)) eliminated preload dependency down to 50% of the baseline EDV. PWR(mx) adjustment using V(0Est) (PAMP(V0Est)) showed similar preload independency. Enhancing contractility increased PAMP(V0PWR) and PAMP(V0Est) from 176 +/- 52 to 394 +/- 205 W/ml x 10(4) and 145 +/- 51 to 404 +/- 261 W/ml x 10(4), respectively, accompanied by an increase of PRSW from 13.0 +/- 4.5 to 29.7 +/- 16.4 mmHg (all P <0.01). PAMP(V0PWR) and PAMP(V0Est) correlated with PRSW (r = 0.85; r = 0.77; both P <0.001). Numerical modeling confirmed the accuracy of our experimental data. Thus preload adjustment of PWR(mx) should consider a linear PWR(mx) versus EDV relationship with distinct V(0PWR). PAMP(V0PWR) is a preload-independent estimate of RV contractility that may eventually be determined noninvasively.
右心室(RV)最大功率(PWR(mx))取决于前负荷。本研究的目的是检验我们的假设,即PWR(mx)与舒张末期容积(EDV)的关系类似于负荷独立搏功(SW)与EDV的关系(前负荷可招募搏功,PRSW),是线性的,PWR的x轴截距(V(0PWR))对应于PRSW截距(V(0SW))。如果我们的假设正确,通过调整EDV和V(0PWR),可以消除PWR(mx)的前负荷敏感性。对10只犬植入肺血流探头、微压计和右心室电导导管。在各种条件下双腔静脉闭塞期间获取数据,并拟合为PWR(mx)=a·(EDV - V(0PWR))(β),其中a是该关系的斜率。PWR(mx)与EDV的关系未偏离线性(β = 1.09,与1相比P无显著性差异),且V(0PWR)与V(0SW)相关(r = 0.93,P <0.0001)。V(0PRW)与稳态EDV和左心室舒张末期压力相关,从而可以估计V(0PWR)(V(0Est))并对单搏PWR(mx)进行前负荷调整。将PWR(mx)除以EDV与V(0PWR)的差值(PAMP(V0PWR))可将前负荷依赖性消除至基线EDV的50%。使用V(0Est)进行PWR(mx)调整(PAMP(V0Est))显示出类似的前负荷独立性。增强收缩性使PAMP(V0PWR)和PAMP(V0Est)分别从176±52增加至394±205 W/ml×10(4)以及从145±51增加至404±261 W/ml×10(4),同时PRSW从13.0±4.5增加至29.7±16.4 mmHg(所有P <0.01)。PAMP(V0PWR)和PAMP(V0Est)与PRSW相关(r = 0.85;r = 0.77;两者P <0.001)。数值模拟证实了我们实验数据的准确性。因此,对PWR(mx)进行前负荷调整时应考虑PWR(mx)与EDV的线性关系以及不同的V(0PWR)。PAMP(V0PWR)是右心室收缩性的前负荷独立估计值,最终可能通过无创方法确定。