Suppr超能文献

一项多中心随机III期试验,比较持续静脉输注(PVI)氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与PVI 5-FU联合丝裂霉素治疗不可切除胰腺癌的疗效。

Multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin in inoperable pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

Maisey Nick, Chau Ian, Cunningham David, Norman Andrew, Seymour Matt, Hickish Tamas, Iveson Tim, O'Brien Mary, Tebbutt Niall, Harrington Angela, Hill Mark

机构信息

Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3130-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.029.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin (MMC) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in a multicenter, prospectively randomized study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred eight patients were randomized to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/d for a maximum of 24 weeks) or PVI 5-FU plus MMC (7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks for four courses). The major end points were tumor response, survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were balanced for baseline demographic factors, and 62% had metastatic disease. The overall response rate was 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]) 3.2% to 13.7% for patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 17.6%; 95% CI 10.3% to 25.1% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.04). Median failure-free survival was 2.8 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.14). Median survival was 5.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 6.5 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.34). Toxicities in both arms were mild. There was an increased incidence of neutropenia in the 5-FU plus MMC arm (P <.01), although no differences in infection were seen. No patients developed hemolytic uremic syndrome. Global QOL improved significantly after 24 weeks of treatment compared with baseline for patients receiving 5-FU plus MMC, although there was no statistically significant difference in QOL between arms.

CONCLUSION

PVI 5-FU plus MMC resulted in a superior response rate in comparison with PVI 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic cancer, but this did not translate into a survival advantage. These results emphasize the importance of chemotherapy in this setting and the continuing value of the fluoropyrimidines in pancreatic cancer.

摘要

目的

在一项多中心、前瞻性随机研究中,比较持续静脉输注(PVI)氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与PVI 5-FU联合丝裂霉素(MMC)治疗晚期胰腺癌患者的疗效。

患者与方法

208例患者被随机分为接受PVI 5-FU(300mg/m²/天,最多24周)或PVI 5-FU联合MMC(每6周7mg/m²,共四个疗程)治疗。主要终点为肿瘤反应、生存率、毒性和生活质量(QOL)。

结果

两个治疗组在基线人口统计学因素方面均衡,62%的患者患有转移性疾病。单独接受PVI 5-FU治疗的患者总体缓解率为8.4%(95%置信区间[CI])3.2%至13.7%,而接受PVI 5-FU联合MMC治疗的患者为17.6%;95%CI为10.3%至25.1%(P = 0.04)。PVI 5-FU组的无进展生存期中位数为2.8个月,PVI 5-FU联合MMC组为3.8个月(P = 0.14)。PVI 5-FU组的总生存期中位数为5.1个月,PVI 5-FU联合MMC组为6.5个月(P = 0.34)。两组的毒性均较轻。5-FU联合MMC组的中性粒细胞减少发生率增加(P < 0.01),尽管在感染方面未见差异。无患者发生溶血性尿毒症综合征。与基线相比,接受5-FU联合MMC治疗的患者在治疗24周后总体生活质量显著改善,尽管两组之间的生活质量无统计学显著差异。

结论

在晚期胰腺癌中,PVI 5-FU联合MMC与单独使用PVI 5-FU相比,缓解率更高,但这并未转化为生存优势。这些结果强调了化疗在这种情况下的重要性以及氟嘧啶类药物在胰腺癌治疗中的持续价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验