St-Georges Annie J, Swift Edward J, Thompson Jeffrey Y, Heymann Harald O
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Montreal, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Quebec.
Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):410-7.
This in vitro study evaluated the wear resistance of resin composite polymerized using four different light-curing systems. For this, a well-defined cylindrical cavity preparation (4.0 mm in diameter x 3.0 mm in depth) was made in a ceramic block (n=4 per material/light condition). Uncured material, either a universal hybrid composite (Herculite XRV) or a flowable hybrid composite (Revolution Formula 2), was packed and light-cured from the top surface only with one of the four light-curing units: 1) a conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen light, 2) a soft-start light, 3) an argon-ion laser or 4) a plasma-arc curing light. After storing the specimens in deionized water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the excess cured material was ground through successive grits up to a final 1200-grit SiC abrasive. The specimens were placed in deionized water at 37 degrees C for an additional 24 hours. Wear simulation was performed using a four-station Leinfelder-type three-body wear device. A slurry of water and unplasticized polymethylmethacrylate beads, simulating an artificial food bolus, was placed on the surface of each resin-composite-restored ceramic block. The entire cycling procedure was carried out 400,000 times. Impressions of each resin composite surface were taken with polyvinylsiloxane and epoxy replicas were made. Wear analyses were conducted by generating tracings across the worn surface of epoxy replicas using profilometer scans. For the universal hybrid composite and the flowable hybrid composite, the lowest wear occurred in specimens that were cured using the conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen light, and the highest wear was detected on those specimens made using the argon-ion laser. For both resin composites, the mean wear for specimens cured using the argon-ion laser was significantly higher than that of the specimens cured with the three other lights, which were statistically similar.
这项体外研究评估了使用四种不同光固化系统聚合的树脂复合材料的耐磨性。为此,在陶瓷块中制备了明确界定的圆柱形腔(直径4.0毫米×深度3.0毫米)(每种材料/光照条件下n = 4)。未固化的材料,即通用混合型复合材料(Herculite XRV)或可流动混合型复合材料(Revolution Formula 2),仅从顶面填充并用以下四种光固化单元之一进行光固化:1)传统石英钨卤素灯,2)软启动灯,3)氩离子激光或4)等离子弧固化灯。将标本在37℃的去离子水中储存24小时后,将多余的固化材料依次通过不同粒度的砂纸研磨,直至最终使用1200目碳化硅磨料。将标本在37℃的去离子水中再放置24小时。使用四工位莱因费尔德型三体磨损装置进行磨损模拟。将水和未增塑聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯珠粒的浆液(模拟人造食团)置于每个树脂复合材料修复的陶瓷块表面。整个循环过程进行400,000次。用聚乙烯基硅氧烷对每个树脂复合材料表面进行印模,并制作环氧复制品。通过使用轮廓仪扫描在环氧复制品的磨损表面生成轨迹来进行磨损分析。对于通用混合型复合材料和可流动混合型复合材料,使用传统石英钨卤素灯固化的标本磨损最低,而使用氩离子激光制作的标本磨损最高。对于两种树脂复合材料,使用氩离子激光固化的标本的平均磨损明显高于使用其他三种灯固化的标本,而其他三种灯固化的标本磨损在统计学上相似。