Rueggeberg F A, Ergle J W, Mettenburg D J
Dental Materials Section, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(6):340-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00243.x.
This research investigated composite depths of cure using a variety of light-curing units and exposure protocols.
Composite (Herculite XRV, shade A2, Kerr, Orange, California) was exposed in opaque compules to conventional quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) units, soft-start units, high-intensity QTH and plasma arc (PAC) curing lights, and one argon laser. Cured compules were sonicated to remove uncured composite and were sectioned and polished along the long axis to expose cured composite. Knoop hardness was measured 0.5 mm from the irradiated, top surface and then at 1.0 mm and in 1.0-mm increments until reliable readings could no longer be obtained. Hardness values were compared by analysis of variance at similar depths within a specific curing-light classification, using the hardness of the standard 40-second conventional QTH exposure as comparison (Dunnett's t-test). Depth of cure was defined as the deepest hardness value found equivalent to that at 0.5-mm depth for a specific curing light and scenario.
Conventional QTH lights provided similar hardness profiles. At 2-mm depth, use of a different unit or curing tip made no difference in hardness compared with the standard. At this depth, soft-start (pulse-delay and step-cure) methods yielded hardness similar to that of the standard. High-intensity QTH lights provided similar hardness at 2-mm depth in 10 seconds to that of the standard 40-second exposure. Plasma arc exposure for less than 10 seconds produced inferior hardness compared with the standard. A 10-second PAC and a 5-second laser exposure gave hardness at 2-mm depth equivalent to that of the 40-second standard. Depth of cure for almost all curing scenarios was not greater than 2 mm.
Similar-type conventional QTH lights with different tip diameter (8 and 12 mm) provide similar composite cure characteristics. Soft-start techniques provide similar cure profiles to those achieved with conventional QTH technique when used according to manufacturer's recommendations. High-intensity QTH units and the argon laser can reduce exposure time while providing composite with similar hardness to that of conventional QTH curing. Plasma arc exposure should be at least of 10 seconds duration to provide hardness equivalent to that achieved with conventional 40-second QTH exposure. Even with consideration of high-intensity curing units, composite increments should still be no greater than 2 mm to provide homogeneous hardness.
本研究使用多种光固化设备和照射方案,对复合树脂的固化深度进行了研究。
将复合树脂(Herculite XRV,A2色,Kerr公司,加利福尼亚州奥兰治)置于不透明的胶囊中,分别用传统的石英钨卤素(QTH)灯、软启动灯、高强度QTH灯和等离子弧(PAC)固化灯以及一台氩离子激光进行照射。将固化后的胶囊超声处理以去除未固化的复合树脂,然后沿长轴进行切片和抛光,以暴露固化的复合树脂。在距照射的顶面0.5 mm处测量努氏硬度,然后在1.0 mm处及以1.0 mm的增量进行测量,直至无法再获得可靠的读数。在特定固化灯类别内的相似深度处,通过方差分析比较硬度值,并以标准的40秒传统QTH照射的硬度作为对照(Dunnett t检验)。固化深度定义为在特定固化灯和照射方案下,发现的与0.5 mm深度处硬度相当的最深硬度值。
传统QTH灯的硬度分布相似。在2 mm深度处,与标准情况相比,使用不同的设备或固化头对硬度没有影响。在此深度,软启动(脉冲延迟和分步固化)方法产生的硬度与标准方法相似。高强度QTH灯在10秒内达到的2 mm深度处的硬度与标准的40秒照射相似。与标准相比,等离子弧照射少于10秒时产生的硬度较低。10秒的PAC照射和5秒的激光照射在2 mm深度处产生的硬度与40秒标准照射相当。几乎所有固化方案的固化深度均不超过2 mm。
具有不同尖端直径(8和12 mm)的同类传统QTH灯提供相似的复合树脂固化特性。按照制造商的建议使用时,软启动技术可提供与传统QTH技术相似的固化分布。高强度QTH设备和氩离子激光可减少照射时间,同时为复合树脂提供与传统QTH固化相似的硬度。等离子弧照射时间应至少为10秒,以提供与传统40秒QTH照射相当的硬度。即使考虑到高强度固化设备,复合树脂增量仍不应超过2 mm,以确保硬度均匀。