Isbister William H, Al-Sanea Nasser
Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Jun;72(6):421-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02436.x.
The problem of directly comparing morbidity and mortality rates between institutions without some sort of adjustment for case mix is well documented. Scoring systems have been developed to allow comparisons to be made. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) is one such system. It was designed to predict operative mortality and morbidity in differing settings and to be independent of case mix. The present study examines the use of POSSUM in colorectal practice in Saudi Arabia.
Patients referred to King Faisal Specialist Hospital between 1990 and 1998 for primary management of an histologically proven rectal cancer were identified. POSSUM mortality and morbidity scores and Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score (P-POSSUM) mortality scores were calculated separately for each patient, and predicted rates were compared with observed rates in the patients studied.
There were 70 men (mean age: 55.6 years; range: 25-87) and 75 women (mean age: 52.8 years; range: 26-84). One hundred and six patients underwent 'curative' surgery. Abdominoperineal resection was the most frequently performed procedure. Major anastomotic leakage following anterior resection occurred in two of fifty patients. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism but no patient developed postoperative myocardial infarction. Two patients died. The median and mean physiological and operative severity scores were 13 (range: 12-37) and 17 (range: 8-37) and 14.68 and 18.36, respectively. The overall POSSUM-predicted (using median scores) morbidity and mortality rates were 35.4% and 6.7%. The P-POSSUM-predicted (using mean scores) mortality rate was 3.5%. Observed morbidity and mortality rates were 54.5% and 1.4%.
POSSUM failed to predict outcomes accurately in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer in Saudi Arabia. P-POSSUM also overpredicted mortality but to a lesser extent. Patient's 'wellness' and the previously identified inability of POSSUM to accurately predict death in low-risk populations may explain these findings. Care must be exercised in using the POSSUM formulae for risk adjustment in different settings.
在没有对病例组合进行某种调整的情况下,直接比较不同机构之间的发病率和死亡率问题已有充分记录。已经开发了评分系统以便进行比较。生理和手术严重程度评分系统(POSSUM)就是这样一种系统。它旨在预测不同情况下的手术死亡率和发病率,并且独立于病例组合。本研究考察了POSSUM在沙特阿拉伯结直肠手术中的应用情况。
确定了1990年至1998年间转诊至法赫德国王专科医院接受组织学确诊直肠癌初次治疗的患者。分别为每位患者计算POSSUM死亡率和发病率评分以及朴茨茅斯生理和手术严重程度评分(P-POSSUM)死亡率评分,并将预测率与所研究患者的观察率进行比较。
有70名男性(平均年龄:55.6岁;范围:25 - 87岁)和75名女性(平均年龄:52.8岁;范围:26 - 84岁)。106例患者接受了“根治性”手术。腹会阴联合切除术是最常施行的手术。50例前切除术患者中有2例发生了严重吻合口漏。1例患者发生肺栓塞,但无患者发生术后心肌梗死。2例患者死亡。生理和手术严重程度评分的中位数和平均值分别为13(范围:12 - 37)和17(范围:8 - 37)以及14.68和18.36。总体POSSUM预测(使用中位数评分)的发病率和死亡率分别为35.4%和6.7%。P-POSSUM预测(使用平均值评分)的死亡率为3.5%。观察到的发病率和死亡率分别为54.5%和1.4%。
在沙特阿拉伯接受直肠癌手术的患者中,POSSUM未能准确预测预后。P-POSSUM也高估了死亡率,但程度较轻。患者的“健康状况”以及之前确定的POSSUM无法准确预测低风险人群死亡的情况可能解释了这些结果。在不同情况下使用POSSUM公式进行风险调整时必须谨慎。