Da Silva Paulo Sérgio Lucas, Paulo Chiu Seing Tsok, de Oliveira Iglesias Simone Brasil, de Carvalho Werther Brunow, Santana e Meneses Flávia
Rua das Aroeiras, 30 ap 22. Bairro Jardim, Santo André, São Paulo, 09090-000, Brazil.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jul;28(7):943-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1326-2. Epub 2002 May 10.
To test air insufflation as an adjunct to placement of enteral feeding tubes and the effectiveness of using a smaller insufflation volume in pediatric patients.
A randomized, controlled study in a pediatric intensive care unit in two tertiary hospitals.
A total of 78 children with indication for transpyloric tube feeding were studied.
An unweighted feeding tube was placed into the stomach through the nares; a 20-ml syringe was used to insufflate 10 ml/kg air into the stomach. The tube was advanced an estimated distance into the pylorus or beyond. The control group received the same procedure except for air insufflation. Resident physicians performed all procedures. Abdominal radiography was performed 3 h later.
Of 38 tubes in the study group 33 (86.8%) were successfully placed in a single attempt, compared to 18 of 40 tubes (45%) in the control group. Compared with the technique of using 20 ml/kg air for insufflation, no statistically significant difference was observed. No significant complication was observed.
The gastric insufflation technique required no expensive equipment, minimal training, and consistently allowed transpyloric passage of feeding tubes. The use of 10 ml/kg air may significantly improve the rate of success without increasing risks.
测试空气注入作为肠内喂养管放置辅助手段的效果,以及在儿科患者中使用较小注入量的有效性。
在两家三级医院的儿科重症监护病房进行的一项随机对照研究。
共研究了78例有经幽门管饲指征的儿童。
将一根未加权的喂养管经鼻置入胃内;使用20毫升注射器向胃内注入10毫升/千克空气。将管子推进到估计的幽门或更远的位置。对照组除不进行空气注入外,接受相同的操作。所有操作均由住院医师进行。3小时后进行腹部X线检查。
研究组38根管子中有33根(86.8%)一次成功置入,而对照组40根管子中有18根(45%)。与使用20毫升/千克空气进行注入的技术相比,未观察到统计学上的显著差异。未观察到明显并发症。
胃内注入技术不需要昂贵的设备,培训要求最低,并且始终能使喂养管通过幽门。使用10毫升/千克空气可能会显著提高成功率而不增加风险。