Cocconi Giorgio, Di Blasio Beatrice, Boni Corrado, Bisagni Giancarlo, Ceci Guido, Rondini Ermanno, Bella Mariangela, Leonardi Francesco, Savoldi Luisa, Camisa Roberta, Bruzzi Paolo
Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
Cancer. 2002 Jul 15;95(2):228-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10678.
BACKGROUND: According to the overview of Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, anthracycline containing regimens are superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma, but no comparative information is available in terms of primary chemotherapy. In the current randomized controlled trial, the authors compared CMF with a chemotherapy regimen including CMF, epirubicin, and vincristine (CMFEV). METHODS: Two hundred eleven patients with Stages I and II palpable breast carcinoma and tumor diameter > 2.5 cm or < or = 2.5 cm with cytologically proven axillary lymph node involvement were randomized to receive CMF (arm A) or CMFEV regimen (arm B) for four cycles before surgery. After surgery, patients in both arms received adjuvant CMF for three cycles; the postmenopausal patients also received tamoxifen for two years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the complete response (CR) and in the CR plus partial response (PR) rates between the two arms. In the subset analysis, among premenopausal patients, significantly higher rates of CR (26% vs 4%, P = 0.004) and of CR + PR rates (80% vs 54%, P = 0.007) were observed in the CMFEV, as compared to the CMF arm. Multivariate analysis confirmed the presence of a significant interaction between menopausal status and type of treatment on the probability of achieving CR (P = 0.02) or CR + PR (P = 0.01). There were no major differences in the side effects of the two treatments, with the exception of more frequent alopecia in the experimental arm. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study are in line with those of previous published randomized clinical trials comparing regimens without and with anthracycline as adjuvant treatment, indicating an agreement between the short term response to primary chemotherapy and the long term results observed in the adjuvant setting.
背景:根据早期乳腺癌试验者协作组的综述,含蒽环类药物的方案作为乳腺癌辅助化疗优于环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)方案,但在新辅助化疗方面尚无比较信息。在当前的随机对照试验中,作者比较了CMF与一种包含CMF、表柔比星和长春新碱的化疗方案(CMFEV)。 方法:211例Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期可触及的乳腺癌患者,肿瘤直径>2.5 cm或≤2.5 cm且经细胞学证实腋窝淋巴结受累,随机分为两组,术前接受4个周期的CMF方案(A组)或CMFEV方案(B组)化疗。术后,两组患者均接受3个周期的辅助CMF化疗;绝经后患者还接受2年的他莫昔芬治疗。 结果:两组之间的完全缓解(CR)率以及CR加部分缓解(PR)率无显著差异。在亚组分析中,与CMF组相比,绝经前患者中,CMFEV组的CR率(26%对4%,P = 0.004)和CR + PR率(80%对54%,P = 0.007)显著更高。多因素分析证实,绝经状态与治疗类型之间在达到CR(P = 0.02)或CR + PR(P = 0.01)的概率上存在显著交互作用。两种治疗的副作用无重大差异,除了试验组脱发更频繁。 结论:本研究结果与先前发表的比较有无蒽环类药物方案作为辅助治疗的随机临床试验结果一致,表明新辅助化疗的短期反应与辅助治疗中观察到的长期结果相符。
Apoptosis. 2021-8
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005-12