Diaz Geraldine C, Renz John F, Mudge Chris, Roberts John P, Ascher Nancy L, Emond Jean C, Rosenthal Philip
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ann Surg. 2002 Jul;236(1):120-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200207000-00018.
To elicit donor opinions on liver living donation through use of a survey that protected the anonymity of the respondent and to assay long-term (follow-up > 1 year) donor health by a widely recognized instrument for health assessment.
Living-donor liver transplantation is an accepted technique for children that has recently been extended to adults. Limited donor outcomes data suggest favorable results, but no outcomes data have been reported using an instrument that elicits an anonymous response from the donor or employs a widely recognized health survey.
Forty-one living-donors between June 1992 and June 1999 were identified and included in this study, regardless of specific donor or recipient outcome. Each donor received a 68-question survey and a standard McMaster Health Index.
Survey response was 80%. All donors were satisfied with the information provided to them before donation. Eighty-eight percent of donors initially learned of living donation only after their child had been diagnosed with liver disease: 44% through the transplant center, 40% by popular media, 12% by their pediatrician, and 4% by their primary care physician. Physical symptoms, including pain and the surgical wound, were recurrent items of concern. Perception of time to "complete" recovery were less than 3 months (74%), 3 to 6 months (16%), and more than 6 months (10%). Donors' return to physical activities was shown by above-mean McMaster physical scores; scores for social and emotional health were not different from population data. There were no reported changes in sexual function or menstruation after donation, and five of six donors procreated.
Donors overwhelmingly endorsed living donation regardless of recipient outcome or the occurrence of a complication. Eighty-nine percent advocated "increased" application of living donation beyond "emergency situations," and no donor responded that living donation should be abandoned or that he or she felt "forced" to donate.
通过使用一项保护受访者匿名性的调查,征求活体肝供体的意见,并通过一种广泛认可的健康评估工具来分析长期(随访>1年)供体的健康状况。
活体肝移植是一种已被接受的针对儿童的技术,最近已扩展至成人。有限的供体结局数据显示结果良好,但尚未有使用能从供体获得匿名回复的工具或采用广泛认可的健康调查的结局数据报道。
确定了1992年6月至1999年6月间的41名活体供体并纳入本研究,无论具体的供体或受者结局如何。每位供体都收到一份包含68个问题的调查问卷和一份标准的麦克马斯特健康指数。
调查回复率为80%。所有供体对捐赠前提供给他们的信息都感到满意。88%的供体最初是在其孩子被诊断出肝病后才了解到活体捐赠:44%是通过移植中心,40%是通过大众媒体,12%是通过他们的儿科医生,4%是通过他们的初级保健医生。包括疼痛和手术伤口在内的身体症状是反复出现的关注点。认为“完全”康复所需时间少于3个月的占74%,3至6个月的占16%,超过6个月的占10%。供体恢复体育活动情况通过麦克马斯特身体评分高于平均水平得以体现;社会和情绪健康评分与总体人群数据无差异。捐赠后未报告性功能或月经有变化,六名供体中有五名生育了子女。
无论受者结局或是否发生并发症,供体绝大多数都认可活体捐赠。89%的供体主张在“紧急情况”之外“增加”活体捐赠的应用,没有供体回复说应放弃活体捐赠或感觉自己是“被迫”捐赠的。