Janda J Michael, Abbott Sharon L, Khashe Shideh, Probert Will
Microbial Diseases Laboratory, Division of Communicable Disease Control, California Department of Health Services, Berkeley, CA 94704-1011, USA.
J Med Microbiol. 2002 Jul;51(7):575-622. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-7-575.
The present study characterised 73 Hafnia alvei isolates and five Escherichia isolates (originally identified as H. alvei) isolated from cases of diarrhoeal disease by the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Branch (ICDDRB) in Bangladesh. Based upon the hydrolysis of arbutin and aesculin and the fermentation of salicin and D-arabinose, four distinct biotypes could be recognised among the 73 H. alvei isolates tested; biotype 1 (D-(-)-arabinose-positive only) accounted for 75% of all isolates analysed. Hydrolysis of aglycone compounds such as arbutin, salicin and aesculin appeared to be associated with expression of beta-glucosidase activity. ICDDRB isolates, when compared with type or reference strains of H. alvei, were shown not to belong to the genus Hafnia based upon resistance to Hafnia-specific bacteriophage 1672, possession of the phoE gene, expression of glutamate decarboxylase activity and significant 16S rDNA sequence divergence (approximately 8%) from the type strain, ATCC 13337T. True H. alvei strains, implicated in outbreaks of diarrhoeal disease in Canada, lacked the eaeA gene in contrast to ICDDRB isolates. Twenty-two H. alvei isolates were selected for further study. Based upon partial 16S rDNA sequencing, these 22 isolates fell into two genomic groups (genomospecies), identical to DNA groups previously established by DNA hybridisation studies. Markers such as motility, biotype, or enzymic or carbohydrate fermentation patterns did not correlate totally with DNA grouping, although malonate utilisation appeared to be the single best discriminatory phenotype. The results indicate that the genus Hafnia is heterogeneous and there do not appear to be any laboratory data available specifically linking these organisms to gastro-enteritis.
本研究对从孟加拉国腹泻疾病研究国际中心(ICDDRB)的腹泻病病例中分离出的73株蜂房哈夫尼亚菌和5株大肠杆菌(最初鉴定为蜂房哈夫尼亚菌)进行了特征分析。根据熊果苷和七叶苷的水解以及水杨苷和D-阿拉伯糖的发酵情况,在所测试的73株蜂房哈夫尼亚菌中可识别出四种不同的生物型;生物型1(仅D-(-)-阿拉伯糖阳性)占所有分析菌株的75%。熊果苷、水杨苷和七叶苷等糖苷配基化合物的水解似乎与β-葡萄糖苷酶活性的表达有关。与蜂房哈夫尼亚菌的模式菌株或参考菌株相比,ICDDRB分离株基于对蜂房哈夫尼亚菌特异性噬菌体1672的抗性、phoE基因的存在、谷氨酸脱羧酶活性的表达以及与模式菌株ATCC 13337T的16S rDNA序列存在显著差异(约8%),显示不属于哈夫尼亚属。与ICDDRB分离株不同,在加拿大腹泻病暴发中涉及的真正蜂房哈夫尼亚菌菌株缺乏eaeA基因。选择了22株蜂房哈夫尼亚菌分离株进行进一步研究。基于部分16S rDNA测序,这22株分离株分为两个基因组群(基因组种),与先前通过DNA杂交研究建立的DNA群相同。运动性、生物型或酶或碳水化合物发酵模式等标记与DNA分组并不完全相关,尽管丙二酸利用似乎是唯一最佳的鉴别表型。结果表明,哈夫尼亚属是异质的,似乎没有任何实验室数据能将这些微生物与肠胃炎明确联系起来。