Naumann Andreas, Dennis James E, Awadallah Amad, Carrino David A, Mansour Joseph M, Kastenbauer Ernst, Caplan Arnold I
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
J Histochem Cytochem. 2002 Aug;50(8):1049-58. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000807.
Cartilage is categorized into three general subgroups, hyaline, elastic, and fibrocartilage, based primarily on morphologic criteria and secondarily on collagen (Types I and II) and elastin content. To more precisely define the different cartilage subtypes, rabbit cartilage isolated from joint, nose, auricle, epiglottis, and meniscus was characterized by immunohistochemical (IHC) localization of elastin and of collagen Types I, II, V, VI, and X, by biochemical analysis of total glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, and by biomechanical indentation assay. Toluidine blue staining and safranin-O staining were used for morphological assessment of the cartilage subtypes. IHC staining of the cartilage samples showed a characteristic pattern of staining for the collagen antibodies that varied in both location and intensity. Auricular cartilage is discriminated from other subtypes by interterritorial elastin staining and no staining for Type VI collagen. Epiglottal cartilage is characterized by positive elastin staining and intense staining for Type VI collagen. The unique pattern for nasal cartilage is intense staining for Type V collagen and collagen X, whereas articular cartilage is negative for elastin (interterritorially) and only weakly positive for collagen Types V and VI. Meniscal cartilage shows the greatest intensity of staining for Type I collagen, weak staining for collagens V and VI, and no staining with antibody to collagen Type X. Matching cartilage samples were categorized by total GAG content, which showed increasing total GAG content from elastic cartilage (auricle, epiglottis) to fibrocartilage (meniscus) to hyaline cartilage (nose, knee joint). Analysis of aggregate modulus showed nasal and auricular cartilage to have the greatest stiffness, epiglottal and meniscal tissue the lowest, and articular cartilage intermediate. This study illustrates the differences and identifies unique characteristics of the different cartilage subtypes in rabbits. The results provide a baseline of data for generating and evaluating engineered repair cartilage tissue synthesized in vitro or for post-implantation analysis.
软骨主要根据形态学标准,其次根据胶原蛋白(I型和II型)和弹性蛋白含量分为三个一般亚组,即透明软骨、弹性软骨和纤维软骨。为了更精确地定义不同的软骨亚型,通过对弹性蛋白以及I、II、V、VI和X型胶原蛋白进行免疫组织化学(IHC)定位、对总糖胺聚糖(GAG)含量进行生化分析以及进行生物力学压痕试验,对从关节、鼻子、耳廓、会厌和半月板分离出的兔软骨进行了表征。甲苯胺蓝染色和番红O染色用于软骨亚型的形态学评估。软骨样本的IHC染色显示,胶原蛋白抗体的染色具有特征性模式,在位置和强度上均有所不同。耳廓软骨通过区域间弹性蛋白染色和VI型胶原蛋白无染色与其他亚型区分开来。会厌软骨的特征是弹性蛋白染色阳性和VI型胶原蛋白染色强烈。鼻软骨的独特模式是V型胶原蛋白和X型胶原蛋白染色强烈,而关节软骨弹性蛋白(区域间)染色阴性,V型和VI型胶原蛋白仅弱阳性。半月板软骨I型胶原蛋白染色强度最大,V型和VI型胶原蛋白染色较弱,X型胶原蛋白抗体无染色。匹配的软骨样本按总GAG含量分类,结果显示从弹性软骨(耳廓、会厌)到纤维软骨(半月板)再到透明软骨(鼻子、膝关节),总GAG含量逐渐增加。聚集模量分析显示,鼻软骨和耳廓软骨刚度最大,会厌和半月板组织刚度最低,关节软骨刚度居中。本研究阐明了兔不同软骨亚型的差异并确定了其独特特征。研究结果为生成和评估体外合成的工程化修复软骨组织或植入后分析提供了数据基线。