Suppr超能文献

熊去氧胆酸和/或抗生素用于预防胆管支架阻塞。

Ursodeoxycholic acid and/or antibiotics for prevention of biliary stent occlusion.

作者信息

Galandi D, Schwarzer G, Bassler D, Allgaier H P

机构信息

Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003043.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant biliary obstruction, which requires endoscopic stenting as palliative therapy, is often complicated by clogging of the stent with subsequent jaundice and/or cholangitis. Stent clogging may be caused by microbiological adhesion and biliary stasis. Therefore, antibiotics and choleretic agents like ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) have been investigated to see whether they prolong stent patency.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if UDCA and/or antibiotics may prolong stent patency and survival in patients with strictures of the biliary tract and endoscopically inserted stents.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Trials Register of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Current Contents, EMBASE, and CancerLit were searched until June 2001. Reference lists of the identified articles were checked for further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials investigating UDCA and/or antibiotics in patients with biliary stents were considered for inclusion, regardless of blinding, language, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Principal investigators were contacted for further information. Survival data were combined by using hazard ratios (with 95% confidence interval (95% CI)).

MAIN RESULTS

Five non-blinded randomised trials with 258 patients with malignant strictures treated with polyethylene stents were included. Three trials, including 152 patients, investigated a combination of UDCA and antibiotics versus no treatment. The meta-analysis of these three trials does not show a significant treatment effect on the duration of stent patency (hazard ratio (random effects model) 0.58, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.54) or mortality (hazard ratio (fixed effect model) 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.43). Two trials with 106 patients compared antibiotics with no treatment, one of these trials used a combination of antibiotics and rowachol (an 'alternative' drug of the 'mint' family). The pooled results of these two trials do not show significant effects of antibiotics on the duration of stent patency (hazard ratio (fixed effect model) 0.69 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.30)) or mortality (hazard ratio (fixed effect model) 1.23 (95% CI 0.72 to 2.08). Data concerning duration of hospital stay, frequency of cholangitis, and rate of infectious complications due to selection of antibiotic resistant bacteria strains were not available.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UDCA and/or antibiotics to prevent clogging of biliary stents in patients with malignant stricture of the biliary tract cannot be recommended routinely on the basis of the existing randomised clinical trials. Further trials are needed with rigorous methodology and sufficient statistical power.

摘要

背景

恶性胆管梗阻常需内镜下支架置入作为姑息治疗,其常因支架堵塞继而出现黄疸和/或胆管炎等并发症。支架堵塞可能由微生物黏附和胆汁淤积引起。因此,已对抗生素和熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)等利胆剂进行研究,以观察它们是否能延长支架通畅时间。

目的

评估UDCA和/或抗生素能否延长胆管狭窄且内镜置入支架患者的支架通畅时间和生存期。

检索策略

检索了Cochrane肝胆组试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆、医学索引在线数据库(MEDLINE)、《现刊目次》、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和癌症文献数据库(CancerLit),检索截至2001年6月。对已识别文章的参考文献列表进行检查以查找更多试验。

入选标准

纳入所有调查UDCA和/或抗生素用于胆管支架置入患者的随机或半随机临床试验,无论是否设盲、语言及发表状态如何。

数据收集与分析

两名评价者独立进行试验纳入、质量评估和数据提取。与主要研究者联系以获取更多信息。生存数据采用风险比(及95%置信区间(95%CI))进行合并。

主要结果

纳入了5项非设盲随机试验,共258例接受聚乙烯支架治疗的恶性狭窄患者。3项试验(共152例患者)研究了UDCA与抗生素联合治疗对比未治疗的情况。这3项试验的Meta分析未显示对支架通畅持续时间(风险比(随机效应模型)0.58,95%CI 0.22至1.54)或死亡率(风险比(固定效应模型)0.99,95%CI 0.68至1.43)有显著治疗效果。2项试验(共106例患者)对比了抗生素治疗与未治疗的情况,其中1项试验使用了抗生素与消胆胺(薄荷家族的一种“替代”药物)的联合治疗。这2项试验的汇总结果未显示抗生素对支架通畅持续时间(风险比(固定效应模型)0.69(95%CI 0.37至1.30))或死亡率(风险比(固定效应模型)1.23(95%CI 0.72至2.08))有显著影响。关于住院时间、胆管炎发生频率以及因选择抗生素耐药菌株导致的感染并发症发生率的数据不可得。

评价者结论

基于现有随机临床试验,不建议常规使用UDCA和/或抗生素治疗来预防胆管恶性狭窄患者的胆管支架堵塞。需要采用严格方法和足够统计学效力进行进一步试验。

相似文献

1
Ursodeoxycholic acid and/or antibiotics for prevention of biliary stent occlusion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003043.
2
Palliative biliary stents for obstructing pancreatic carcinoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD004200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004200.pub4.
3
Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD000551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000551.
4
Palliative biliary stents for obstructing pancreatic carcinoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD004200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004200.pub2.
5
Glucocorticosteroids for infants with biliary atresia following Kasai portoenterostomy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD008735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008735.pub3.
7
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 6;4(4):CD011746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011746.pub2.
8
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
9
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Biliary drainage in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: results of an Italian consensus conference.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6207-6226. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11245-4. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
The perfect biliary plastic stent: the search goes on.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep-Oct;36(5):490-496. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0826. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Stent placement in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2014 Apr 28;3(4):74-78. doi: 10.1002/cld.323. eCollection 2014 Apr.
10
Mechanisms of Biliary Plastic Stent Occlusion and Efforts at Prevention.
Clin Endosc. 2016 Mar;49(2):139-46. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.024. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0.
3
Long-term ciprofloxacin treatment for the prevention of biliary stent blockage: a prospective randomized study.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Nov;94(11):3197-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01518.x.
4
A combination of ciprofloxacin and Rowachol does not prevent biliary stent occlusion.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Mar;49(3 Pt 1):316-21. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70007-6.
5
Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints.
Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981230)17:24<2815::aid-sim110>3.0.co;2-8.
6
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
7
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
8
Prevention of biliary stent clogging: a clinical review.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jul;91(7):1301-8.
9
Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction.
Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1655-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90455-3.
10
Randomised trial of prevention of biliary stent occlusion by ursodeoxycholic acid plus norfloxacin.
Lancet. 1994 Aug 27;344(8922):581-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91967-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验