McDermott Ann-Louise, Dutt Sunil N, Reid Andrew P, Proops David W
Departments of Otolaryngology and Implantation Otology, Queen Elizabeth, Selly Oak and Birmingham Children's Hospitals, Birmingham, UK.
J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 2002(28):15-9. doi: 10.1258/0022215021911293.
By spring 2000, a total of 351 patients were implanted in the Birmingham bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) programme. This group consisted of 242 adults and 109 children. The aim of this retrospective questionnaire study was to directly assess patient satisfaction with their current bone-anchored hearing aid in comparison with their previous conventional air and/or bone-conduction hearing aids. The Nijmegen group questionnaire was sent by post to 312 patients who used their BAHA for six months or longer. The questionnaire used was first described by Mylanus et al. (Nijmegen group) in 1998. The total response rate was 72 per cent (227 of 312 patients). The bone-anchored hearing aid was found to be significantly superior to prior conventional hearing aids in all respects.
到2000年春季，共有351名患者植入了伯明翰骨锚式助听器（BAHA）。该组包括242名成人和109名儿童。这项回顾性问卷调查研究的目的是，将患者目前使用的骨锚式助听器与之前使用的传统气导和/或骨导助听器进行直接比较，评估患者对前者的满意度。奈梅亨组问卷通过邮寄方式发送给312名使用BAHA达六个月或更长时间的患者。所使用的问卷最初由米拉努斯等人（奈梅亨组）于1998年描述。总回复率为72%（312名患者中的227名）。结果发现，骨锚式助听器在各方面均明显优于先前的传统助听器。
