• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由经过专门培训的医生提供的院前高级生命支持:在增加生命年数方面是否有好处?

Prehospital advanced life support provided by specially trained physicians: is there a benefit in terms of life years gained?

作者信息

Lossius H M, Søreide E, Hotvedt R, Hapnes S A, Eielsen O V, Førde O H, Steen P A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Rogaland Central Hospital, Stavanger, Norwegian Air Ambulance, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Aug;46(7):771-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460703.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460703.x
PMID:12139529
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of prehospital advanced life support (ALS) is disputed, as is the prehospital use of specially trained, hospital-based physicians. The purpose of the study was to assess the health benefit from an anesthesiologist-manned prehospital emergency medical service (EMS), and to separate the benefit of the anesthesiologist from that of rapid transport.

METHODS

The anesthesiologist-manned helicopter and rapid response car service at Rogaland Central Hospital assisted 1106 patients at the scene during the 18-month study period. Two expert panels assessed patients with a potential health benefit for life years gained (LYG) using a modified Delphi technique. The probability of survival as a result of the studied EMS was multiplied by the life expectancy of each patient. The benefit was attributed either to the anesthesiologist, the rapid transport or a combination of both.

RESULTS

The expert panels estimated a benefit of 504 LYG in 74 patients (7% of the total study population), with a median age of 54 years (range 0-88). The cause of the emergency was cardiac diseases (including cardiac arrest) in 61% of the 74 patients, trauma in 19%, and cardio-respiratory failure as a result of other conditions in 20%. The LYG were equally divided between air and ground missions, and the majority (88%) were attributed solely to ALS by the anesthesiologist.

CONCLUSION

The expert panels found LYG in every 14th patient assisted by this anesthesiologist-manned prehospital EMS. There was no difference in LYG between the helicopter and the rapid response car missions. The role of the anesthesiologist was crucial for health benefits.

摘要

背景

院前高级生命支持(ALS)的益处存在争议,同样存在争议的是在院前使用经过专门培训的医院医生。本研究的目的是评估由麻醉医生提供的院前紧急医疗服务(EMS)对健康的益处,并区分麻醉医生的作用与快速转运的作用。

方法

在为期18个月的研究期间,罗加兰中央医院由麻醉医生配备的直升机和快速反应车服务在现场协助了1106名患者。两个专家小组使用改良的德尔菲技术评估了对潜在健康有益的患者的生命年增益(LYG)。将所研究的EMS导致的生存概率乘以每个患者的预期寿命。益处要么归因于麻醉医生,要么归因于快速转运,或者两者兼而有之。

结果

专家小组估计,74名患者(占研究总人群的7%)的生命年增益为504,中位年龄为54岁(范围0 - 88岁)。在这74名患者中,61%的紧急情况原因是心脏疾病(包括心脏骤停),19%是创伤,20%是其他情况导致的心肺衰竭。生命年增益在空运和陆运任务中平均分配,并且大多数(88%)仅归因于麻醉医生的ALS。

结论

专家小组发现,在由这名麻醉医生提供的院前EMS协助的每14名患者中就有一名获得生命年增益。直升机和快速反应车任务的生命年增益没有差异。麻醉医生的作用对健康益处至关重要。

相似文献

1
Prehospital advanced life support provided by specially trained physicians: is there a benefit in terms of life years gained?由经过专门培训的医生提供的院前高级生命支持:在增加生命年数方面是否有好处?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Aug;46(7):771-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460703.x.
2
Paramedic helicopter emergency service in rural Finland - do benefits justify the cost?芬兰农村地区的护理直升机紧急服务——效益是否能证明成本合理?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Aug;46(7):779-84. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460704.x.
3
Are prehospital deaths from trauma and accidental injury preventable? A direct historical comparison to assess what has changed in two decades.创伤和意外伤害导致的院前死亡是否可以预防?通过直接的历史比较来评估二十年来情况有何变化。
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):978-984. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.039. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
When is an anesthesiologist needed in a helicopter emergency medical service in northern Norway?在挪威北部的直升机紧急医疗服务中,何时需要麻醉医生?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Aug;46(7):785-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460705.x.
5
Trauma patients receiving CPR: predictors of survival.接受心肺复苏的创伤患者:生存预测因素。
J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):951-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000162174.06448.5a.
6
Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS - A Descriptive Study.地面运输高级生命支持急救医疗服务中的院前血液制品管理机会——一项描述性研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Jun;33(3):230-236. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000274. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
7
Multicenter Canadian study of prehospital trauma care.加拿大院前创伤护理多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):153-60. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048374.46952.10.
8
HEMS vs. Ground-BLS care in traumatic cardiac arrest.直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)与地面基础生命支持(BLS)护理在创伤性心脏骤停中的应用对比
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):79-84. doi: 10.1080/10903120590891886.
9
Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS Study Phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support.在多中心基础生命支持/除颤系统中与提高心脏骤停存活率相关的可改变因素:安大略省院外高级生命支持(OPALS)研究第一阶段结果
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;33(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70415-4.
10
Outcome following physician supervised prehospital resuscitation: a retrospective study.医生监督下的院前复苏后结果:一项回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 7;5(1):e006167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006167.

引用本文的文献

1
Utopia for Norwegian helicopter emergency medical services: Estimating the number of bases needed to radically bring down response times, and lives needed to be saved for cost effectiveness.挪威直升机紧急医疗服务的乌托邦:为了达到成本效益,估计需要多少个基地才能从根本上降低反应时间,以及需要拯救多少生命。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0281706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281706. eCollection 2023.
2
Inequities in ambulance allocation associated with transfer delay and mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: evidence from 89 emergency medical stations in China.中国 89 个急救医疗站的研究表明,与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的转院延迟和死亡率相关的救护车分配不均。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Dec 16;21(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01777-3.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Mobile Stroke Unit Care in Norway.
挪威移动卒中单元护理的成本效益分析。
Stroke. 2022 Oct;53(10):3173-3181. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037491. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
The Feedback Form and Its Role in Improving the Quality of Trauma Care.反馈表及其在提高创伤护理质量中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 7;19(3):1866. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031866.
5
Physician-Staffed Emergency Vehicle Crash: A Case Report.配备医师的急救车撞车事故:一例报告
Cureus. 2022 Jan 8;14(1):e21027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21027. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Airway management in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS): a retrospective observational study of 365 out-of-hospital intubations.直升机紧急医疗服务中的气道管理:365 例院外插管的回顾性观察研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00579-8.
7
Prehospital Trauma Care in Disasters and Other Mass Casualty Incidents - A Proposal for Hospital-Based Special Medical Response Teams.灾害及其他大规模伤亡事件中的院前创伤护理——关于医院特殊医疗应急团队的建议
Cureus. 2021 Mar 2;13(3):e13657. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13657.
8
Structured and Systematic Team and Procedure Training in Severe Trauma: Going from 'Zero to Hero' for a Time-Critical, Low-Volume Emergency Procedure Over Three Time Periods.严重创伤的结构化和系统化团队与程序训练:在三个时间段内,针对时间关键、低容量的紧急程序,从零到英雄。
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1340-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05980-1. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Loss of life years due to unavailable helicopter emergency medical service: a single base study from a rural area of Norway.因无法获得直升机紧急医疗服务而导致的生命损失年数:来自挪威农村地区的单一基地研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):233-241. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608056. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
Treatment, transport, and primary care involvement when helicopter emergency medical services are inaccessible: a retrospective study.直升机紧急医疗服务无法提供时的治疗、转运及基层医疗参与情况:一项回顾性研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):397-405. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1523992. Epub 2018 Oct 8.