Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K
Second Surgical Department, Red Cross Hospital Korgialenio-Mpenakio, Athens, Greece.
Minerva Chir. 2002 Aug;57(4):467-74.
BACKGROUND: Our objective is to compare the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and common bile duct (CBD) exploration to those of endoscopic stone extraction and LC in patients with CBD lithiasis based on a prospective randomized study. METHODS: From April 1997 until August 2000, 78 patients were assigned in two groups. Group A (n'36) patients underwent laparoscopic either direct or trancystic duct, CBD exploration and LC. Group B (n'42) patients were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for duct clearance and at a later stage LC was performed. Selection of patients of both groups was done, considering prognostic factors of a preliminary study. RESULTS: Laparoscopic duct clearance was achieved in 85.7% of patients while the respective percentage for the combined approach was 84.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CBD exploration is not yet established as the gold standard procedure for choledocholithiasis and there is the need for further randomized trials and possibly future meta-analyses.
背景:我们的目标是基于一项前瞻性随机研究,比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)联合胆总管(CBD)探查与内镜下取石术联合LC治疗CBD结石患者的结果。 方法:1997年4月至2000年8月,78例患者被分为两组。A组(n = 36)患者接受腹腔镜下直接或经胆囊管的CBD探查及LC。B组(n = 42)患者接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)及内镜括约肌切开术(ES)以清除胆管结石,随后进行LC。两组患者的选择均考虑了一项初步研究的预后因素。 结果:85.7%的患者实现了腹腔镜胆管清除,而联合治疗方法的相应百分比为84.3%。 结论:腹腔镜CBD探查尚未成为胆总管结石的金标准手术,需要进一步的随机试验以及可能的未来荟萃分析。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025-4-14
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2024-4-28