Crick Nicki R, Grotpeter Jennifer K, Bigbee Maureen A
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455-0345, USA.
Child Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;73(4):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00462.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that physically aggressive children exhibit hostile attributional biases in response to instrumental peer provocations, a social information-processing pattern that has been recognized as a contributor to peer-directed aggression. The present studies (N = 127 and N = 535) were designed to extend past research by evaluating the intent attributions and feelings of emotional distress of relationally and physically aggressive children in response to instrumental and relational provocation contexts. Results indicated that physically aggressive children exhibited hostile attributional biases and reported relatively greater distress for instrumental provocation situations, whereas relationally aggressive children exhibited hostile attributional biases and reported relatively greater distress for relational provocation contexts. Implications of these findings for the understanding of factors that may contribute to relational as well as physical aggression are discussed.
大量研究表明,身体攻击型儿童在面对工具性同伴挑衅时表现出敌意归因偏差,这种社会信息加工模式被认为是导致同伴导向攻击行为的一个因素。本研究(N = 127和N = 535)旨在通过评估关系攻击型和身体攻击型儿童在面对工具性挑衅和关系性挑衅情境时的意图归因和情绪困扰感受,来扩展以往的研究。结果表明,身体攻击型儿童表现出敌意归因偏差,并且在工具性挑衅情境中报告的困扰相对更大,而关系攻击型儿童表现出敌意归因偏差,并且在关系性挑衅情境中报告的困扰相对更大。本文讨论了这些发现对于理解可能导致关系攻击和身体攻击的因素的意义。