Robinson Sue, Pennebaker Duane
The Centre for Mental Health Services Research Incorporated, 7 Field Street, Mount Lawley, Western Australia.
Health Promot Int. 2002 Sep;17(3):263-72. doi: 10.1093/heapro/17.3.263.
While considerable evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of specific kinds of interventions for mental illness prevention and to a lesser extent mental health promotion, mental health promotion and illness prevention (MHPIP) remain underdeveloped in Western Australia. The aim of this study was to explore the current state of MHPIP in Western Australia and to highlight some of the structural and systemic issues that need to be addressed if MHPIP services are to be progressed further in this state. For this purpose, the study examined the capacity for delivery of MHPIP services. Opportunities and barriers to the further development of MHPIP were also identified. Thirty-four key stakeholders representing a cross-section of local services, central government agencies and universities were interviewed using a semi-structured interview schedule. The interviews were conducted over a 6-week period. The interview schedule included questions on the workforce, agency liaison and project implementation, and priority areas and issues with respect to research and policy setting in MHPIP. In developing the focus of MHPIP services, critical factors that constitute capacity building were identified. These included readiness to participate in MHPIP, service infrastructure development, workforce development, resource allocation, networks and evaluation of programmes.
虽然有大量证据表明特定类型的干预措施在预防精神疾病以及在较小程度上促进心理健康方面具有有效性,但在西澳大利亚州,促进心理健康和预防疾病(MHPIP)仍未得到充分发展。本研究的目的是探索西澳大利亚州MHPIP的现状,并强调如果要在该州进一步推进MHPIP服务,一些需要解决的结构和系统问题。为此,该研究考察了提供MHPIP服务的能力。还确定了MHPIP进一步发展的机遇和障碍。使用半结构化访谈提纲对代表地方服务、中央政府机构和大学等各方面的34名关键利益相关者进行了访谈。访谈在6周内完成。访谈提纲包括有关劳动力、机构联络和项目实施的问题,以及MHPIP研究和政策制定方面的优先领域和问题。在确定MHPIP服务重点时,确定了构成能力建设的关键因素。这些因素包括参与MHPIP的意愿、服务基础设施发展、劳动力发展、资源分配、网络以及项目评估。