Suppr超能文献

采用血管内支架型人工血管治疗颈动脉“破裂”

Management of carotid 'blowout' with endovascular stent grafts.

作者信息

Warren Frank M, Cohen James I, Nesbit Gary M, Barnwell Stanley L, Wax Mark K, Andersen Peter E

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201-3098, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2002 Mar;112(3):428-33. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200203000-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Since 1992, endovascular techniques for vascular occlusion and stenting have evolved significantly. Endovascular occlusion of the carotid artery has been used in the management of carotid "blowout." Although it seems logical to expand this application to the use of arterial stents to repair rather than occlude the artery when cerebral cross-circulation is inadequate, concerns remain regarding the placement of a foreign body in a contaminated field. The purpose of the present report is to describe our experience with endovascular stents for control of carotid hemorrhage.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

METHODS

Retrospective review of three cases of acute or threatened carotid hemorrhage managed with endovascular stent placement.

RESULTS

Two patients presented with acute carotid blowout, and one patient with a probable sentinel bleed. All patients previously had been heavily treated with surgery and irradiation: Two had developed pharyngocutaneous fistulas, and one had an open wound filled with tumor that surrounded the carotid artery. All were thought to be at significant risk for stroke if the carotid artery was occluded. In all three patients, stent placement resolved the acute hemorrhage. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.3 months. In two patients, the stent became exposed, ultimately thrombosed or extruded, or both. The third patient had no residual sequelae of stenting but died 3 months later.

CONCLUSION

When an unacceptable risk of cardiovascular accident makes occlusion unwise, acute carotid hemorrhage can be successfully managed with directed placement of endovascular stents, but the long-term sequelae of placing these foreign bodies in a field with ongoing contamination make this a temporizing rather than permanent measure for use while more definitive long-term solutions are pursued.

摘要

目的/假设:自1992年以来,用于血管闭塞和支架置入的血管内技术有了显著发展。颈动脉的血管内闭塞已被用于治疗颈动脉“破裂”。虽然当脑交叉循环不足时,将这种应用扩展到使用动脉支架来修复而非闭塞动脉似乎是合理的,但对于在污染区域放置异物仍存在担忧。本报告的目的是描述我们使用血管内支架控制颈动脉出血的经验。

研究设计

回顾性病例分析。

方法

回顾性分析3例采用血管内支架置入术治疗急性或有颈动脉出血风险的病例。

结果

2例患者出现急性颈动脉破裂,1例患者可能有哨兵出血。所有患者此前均接受过大量手术和放疗:2例出现咽皮肤瘘,1例有开放性伤口,周围被肿瘤包围,颈动脉受累。如果闭塞颈动脉,所有患者都被认为有发生中风的重大风险。在所有3例患者中,支架置入术解决了急性出血问题。平均随访时间为8.3个月。2例患者的支架外露,最终血栓形成或支架被挤出,或两者皆有。第3例患者支架置入术后无残留后遗症,但3个月后死亡。

结论

当心血管意外风险不可接受而使闭塞术不明智时,血管内支架定向置入可成功治疗急性颈动脉出血,但在持续污染区域放置这些异物的长期后遗症使得这是一种临时措施而非永久性措施,同时需寻求更明确的长期解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验