Sichel Jean-Yves, Freeman Sharon, Sohmer Haim
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Laryngoscope. 2002 Mar;112(3):542-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200203000-00024.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study were to present an assessment of a new theory to explain lateralization during the Weber test using an animal model. This theory is based on the discovery that a major pathway in bone conduction stimulation to the inner ear is through the skull contents (probably the cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). The placement of a bone vibrator or tuning fork on the skull excites the inner ear by the classic osseous pathway and by the suggested CSF pathway. We assume that there is a phase difference between the stimulation mediated by the ossicular chain (inertial and occlusion mechanisms) and the one mediated by the CSF. The presence of a conductive pathology will decrease the magnitude of the sound energy mediated by the ossicular chain. Thus, the out-of-phase signal arriving through the bony pathways will be decreased, hence increasing the resultant sound intensity stimulating the cochlea.
Prospective animal study.
The experiment was performed on 10 fat sand rats, which had undergone unilateral cochleostomy and a small craniotomy. The auditory nerve brainstem response (ABR) thresholds were measured to air-conducted stimulation, to stimulation with the bone vibrator applied to the skull, and to stimulation with the bone vibrator applied directly to the brain through the craniotomy. The ossicular chain of the second ear was then fixed to the middle ear walls with cyanoacrylate glue to induce a conductive hearing loss. The ABR thresholds to the same three stimuli were then measured again.
After ossicular chain fixation, the ABR threshold to air-conducted stimulation increased, to bone vibrator stimulation on the bone decreased (hearing improvement), and to bone vibrator stimulation directly on the brain remained unchanged.
This experiment confirms the proposed theory. During clinical bone conduction stimulation, there is a phase difference between sound energy reaching the inner ear through the middle ear ossicles and from the CSF. A middle ear conductive pathology removes one of these components, thus increasing the effective sound intensity in the affected ear. On the other hand, when the bone vibrator is applied on the brain, the inner ear is stimulated only through the CSF, so ossicular chain fixation does not change the ABR threshold. Moreover, this study proves that lateralization during the Weber phenomenon is the result, at least in part, of an intensity difference between sound energy reaching the two cochleae.
目的/假设:本研究的目的是使用动物模型对一种新理论进行评估,该理论用于解释韦伯试验期间的听觉偏侧化现象。这一理论基于以下发现:骨传导刺激内耳的一条主要途径是通过颅骨内容物(可能是脑脊液[CSF])。将骨振动器或音叉置于颅骨上,可通过经典的骨传导途径以及所提出的脑脊液途径刺激内耳。我们假设,由听骨链介导的刺激(惯性和阻塞机制)与由脑脊液介导的刺激之间存在相位差。传导性病变的存在会降低听骨链介导的声能大小。因此,通过骨传导途径到达的异相信号会减弱,从而增加刺激耳蜗的合成声强。
前瞻性动物研究。
对10只肥胖沙鼠进行实验,这些沙鼠已接受单侧耳蜗造孔术和小型开颅手术。测量了对气导刺激、将骨振动器置于颅骨上的刺激以及通过开颅手术将骨振动器直接置于脑上的刺激的听神经脑干反应(ABR)阈值。然后用氰基丙烯酸酯胶将第二只耳朵的听骨链固定于中耳壁,以诱发传导性听力损失。随后再次测量对相同三种刺激的ABR阈值。
听骨链固定后,气导刺激的ABR阈值升高,置于颅骨上的骨振动器刺激的ABR阈值降低(听力改善),而直接置于脑上的骨振动器刺激的ABR阈值保持不变。
本实验证实了所提出的理论。在临床骨传导刺激期间,通过中耳听小骨和脑脊液到达内耳的声能之间存在相位差。中耳传导性病变消除了其中一个成分,从而增加了患耳的有效声强。另一方面,当将骨振动器置于脑上时,内耳仅通过脑脊液受到刺激,因此听骨链固定不会改变ABR阈值。此外,本研究证明,韦伯现象期间的听觉偏侧化至少部分是到达两个耳蜗的声能强度差异的结果。