Chordekar Shai, Perez Ronen, Adelman Cahtia, Sohmer Haim
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;24(3):201-4. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0058.
Soft tissue conduction (STC), a recently described mode of auditory stimulation elicited when the clinical bone vibrator is applied to skin sites over the head, neck, and thorax, complements air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC), elicited by the same vibrator. The study assessed skull bone vibrations induced during STC and BC stimulation.
The experiments were conducted on fat sand rats. Thresholds of auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses (ABRs) were recorded and compared to the lowest-intensity sound stimuli that elicited vibrations at the bony vestibule of the inner ear detected by a laser Doppler vibrometer.
Vibrations were detected during BC but not during STC stimulation. ABR was recorded to both STC and to BC stimulation.
Low-intensity STC stimulation does not induce vibrations of the inner ear, showing that STC apparently does not involve mechanisms based on vibrations of bone.
软组织传导(STC)是一种最近被描述的听觉刺激模式,当临床骨振动器应用于头部、颈部和胸部的皮肤部位时会引发这种模式,它补充了由同一振动器引发的气导(AC)和骨导(BC)。该研究评估了在STC和BC刺激过程中诱发的颅骨振动。
实验在肥沙鼠身上进行。记录听神经脑干诱发电位(ABR)的阈值,并与通过激光多普勒振动计检测到的在内耳骨前庭引发振动的最低强度声音刺激进行比较。
在BC刺激过程中检测到振动,但在STC刺激过程中未检测到。对STC和BC刺激均记录到了ABR。
低强度STC刺激不会诱发内耳振动,表明STC显然不涉及基于骨振动的机制。