Suppr超能文献

炭疽芽孢杆菌鼻拭子的大规模筛查:美国国立卫生研究院经验的描述性总结与讨论

Large-scale screening of nasal swabs for Bacillus anthracis: descriptive summary and discussion of the National Institutes of Health's experience.

作者信息

Kiratisin Pattarachai, Fukuda Caroline D, Wong Alexandra, Stock Frida, Preuss Jeanne C, Ediger Laura, Brahmbhatt Trupti N, Fischer Steven H, Fedorko Daniel P, Witebsky Frank G, Gill Vee J

机构信息

Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Aug;40(8):3012-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.3012-3016.2002.

Abstract

In October 2001, a letter containing a large number of anthrax spores was sent through the Brentwood post office in Washington, D.C., to a United States Senate office on Capitol Hill, resulting in contamination in both places. Several thousand people who worked at these sites were screened for spore exposure by collecting nasal swab samples. We describe here a screening protocol which we, as a level A laboratory, used on very short notice to process a large number of specimens (3,936 swabs) in order to report preliminary results as quickly as possible. Six isolates from our screening met preliminary criteria for Bacillus anthracis identification and were referred for definitive testing. Although none of the isolates was later confirmed to be B. anthracis, we studied these isolates further to define their biochemical characteristics and 16S rRNA sequences. Four of the six isolates were identified as Bacillus megaterium, one was identified as Bacillus cereus, and one was an unidentifiable Bacillus sp. Our results suggest that large-scale nasal-swab screening for potential exposure to anthrax spores, particularly if not done immediately postexposure, may not be very effective for detecting B. anthracis but may detect a number of Bacillus spp. that are phenotypically very similar to B. anthracis.

摘要

2001年10月,一封装有大量炭疽芽孢的信件通过华盛顿特区布伦特伍德邮局寄往国会山的一个美国参议院办公室,导致两地均受到污染。对在这些地点工作的数千人通过采集鼻拭子样本进行了孢子暴露筛查。我们在此描述一种筛查方案,作为一个A级实验室,我们在接到通知后很短时间内就采用该方案处理了大量标本(3936份拭子),以便尽快报告初步结果。我们筛查出的6株菌株符合炭疽芽孢杆菌鉴定的初步标准,并被送去进行最终检测。尽管后来没有一株菌株被确认为炭疽芽孢杆菌,但我们对这些菌株进行了进一步研究以确定其生化特性和16S rRNA序列。6株菌株中有4株被鉴定为巨大芽孢杆菌,1株被鉴定为蜡样芽孢杆菌,还有1株是无法鉴定的芽孢杆菌属菌株。我们的结果表明,对潜在的炭疽芽孢暴露进行大规模鼻拭子筛查,特别是如果在暴露后没有立即进行,可能对检测炭疽芽孢杆菌不是很有效,但可能会检测到一些在表型上与炭疽芽孢杆菌非常相似的芽孢杆菌属物种。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Swab protocol for rapid laboratory diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax.快速实验室诊断皮肤炭疽的拭子采集方案。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Dec;50(12):3960-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02076-12. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
6
Screening laboratory requests.筛查实验室申请
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Nov;12(11):1792-3. doi: 10.3201/eid1211.060711.
8
Ruling out Bacillus anthracis.排除炭疽芽孢杆菌。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;10(4):732-5. doi: 10.3201/eid1004.030544.
9
Searching for Bacillus anthracis in suspect powders: a French experience.在可疑粉末中检测炭疽芽孢杆菌:法国的经验。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jan;41(1):524; author reply 524-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.524-525.2003.

本文引用的文献

3
Bioterrorism: implications for the clinical microbiologist.生物恐怖主义:对临床微生物学家的影响。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):364-81. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.364-381.2001.
6
Definitive identification of Bacillus anthracis--a review.炭疽芽孢杆菌的确证鉴定——综述
J Appl Microbiol. 1999 Aug;87(2):237-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00876.x.
7
Clinical and epidemiologic principles of anthrax.炭疽的临床与流行病学原理
Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 Jul-Aug;5(4):552-5. doi: 10.3201/eid0504.990418.
10
The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979.1979年斯维尔德洛夫斯克炭疽疫情。
Science. 1994 Nov 18;266(5188):1202-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7973702.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验