Pawlak Cornelius R, Schwarting Rainer K W
Experimental and Physiological Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, Germany.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Oct;73(3):679-87. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00852-3.
Our previous work has shown that normal male wistar rats can differ systematically with respect to rearing activity in a novel open field: animals with high rearing activity (HRA rats) differed from those with low rearing activity (LRA rats) in dopaminergic and cholinergic brain activity, as well as in their behavioral responsiveness to a cholinergic antagonist, but not in measures of anxiety in the elevated plus-maze. Here, we tested (a) whether HRA vs. LRA reflects responsiveness to novelty, (b) whether such rats voluntarily consume different amounts of the cholinergic agonist nicotine and (c) whether these measures are related to those of anxiety in the plus-maze. Using a novel object test, we found that HRA showed a trend for more object exploration than LRA rats when confronted with two identical novel objects in a familiar open field. When subsequently confronted with a familiar vs. a new object, HRA rats showed substantially more exploration of the new but not of the familiar object than LRA rats. In a subsequent test, HRA vs. LRA rats did not differ in voluntary or forced consumption of oral nicotine, or water. In contrast to rearing activity in a novel open field, measures of anxiety in the plus-maze were neither related to behavior in the novel object test nor to voluntary oral consumption of nicotine, or water. Among others, these data are discussed with respect to dopaminergic and cholinergic forebrain mechanisms, which have previously been found to differ between HRA and LRA rats. Since forebrain dopamine and acetylcholine functions are critical for novelty processing, we suggest that they are also important for the differential behavioral patterns of HRA and LRA rats in the open field, and in the novel object test.
我们之前的研究表明,正常雄性Wistar大鼠在新奇开阔场地中的直立活动方面存在系统性差异:高直立活动的动物(HRA大鼠)与低直立活动的动物(LRA大鼠)在多巴胺能和胆碱能脑活动方面存在差异,在对胆碱能拮抗剂的行为反应方面也存在差异,但在高架十字迷宫中的焦虑测量方面没有差异。在此,我们测试了:(a)HRA与LRA是否反映了对新奇事物的反应性;(b)此类大鼠是否自愿摄入不同量的胆碱能激动剂尼古丁;以及(c)这些测量指标是否与十字迷宫中的焦虑测量指标相关。通过新颖物体测试,我们发现,当在熟悉的开阔场地中面对两个相同的新颖物体时,HRA大鼠比LRA大鼠表现出更多探索新物体的趋势。随后,当面对熟悉物体与新物体时,HRA大鼠对新物体的探索明显多于LRA大鼠,但对熟悉物体的探索则不然。在后续测试中,HRA大鼠与LRA大鼠在口服尼古丁或水的自愿或强制摄入量方面没有差异。与在新奇开阔场地中的直立活动不同,十字迷宫中的焦虑测量指标既与新颖物体测试中的行为无关,也与尼古丁或水的自愿口服摄入量无关。除其他外,这些数据将结合多巴胺能和胆碱能前脑机制进行讨论,此前已发现HRA和LRA大鼠之间存在差异。由于前脑多巴胺和乙酰胆碱功能对新奇事物处理至关重要,我们认为它们对HRA和LRA大鼠在开阔场地和新颖物体测试中的不同行为模式也很重要。