Mayrovitz Harvey N, Sims Nancy
College of Medical Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002 Jul-Aug;15(4):158-64. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200207000-00006.
It was hypothesized that a device or support surface providing intermittent cycles of pressurization and pressure relief might minimize the impact of blood flow deficits in the heels resulting from the application of pressure. Because this possibility depends on whether pressure-relief hyperemia can adequately compensate for blood flow deficits, the main objective was to determine how different temporal patterns of pressurization and pressure relief would affect average skin blood perfusion of the heels.
Using a laser Doppler, skin blood perfusion was measured in the heels of 20 healthy subjects while they lay supine for 80 minutes on a support surface. The end cell supporting the heel produced 3 different cyclic patterns of pressurization and either full or partial pressure relief. Each pattern of 1, 2, or 4 cycles was contained within contiguous 20-minute intervals. Skin blood perfusion was determined during full pressurization and during pressure relief for 2 protocols with 10 subjects each.
University research center.
Overall average skin blood perfusion in relation to baseline.
Full pressure relief yielded a significantly greater skin blood perfusion than partial relief. However, whether pressure relief was full or partial, the average skin blood perfusion of each cyclic pattern was greater than baseline.
Consistent with the proposed hypothesis, pressure-relief cycles resulted in an average heel skin blood perfusion that was greater than resting baseline. In the healthy subjects studied, this occurred because hyperemia during pressure relief compensated for flow deficits during pressurization. These results are applicable when the patient is capable of a normal physiologic hyperemic response. The next major investigative challenge is to examine the impact of pressure-relief cycles on patients with diminished hyperemic reserve.
据推测,一种能提供间歇性加压和减压循环的装置或支撑面,或许可以将因施加压力而导致的足跟血流不足的影响降至最低。由于这种可能性取决于减压性充血能否充分补偿血流不足,所以主要目的是确定不同的加压和减压时间模式会如何影响足跟的平均皮肤血流灌注。
使用激光多普勒仪,在20名健康受试者仰卧于支撑面上80分钟期间,测量他们足跟的皮肤血流灌注。支撑足跟的终端单元产生3种不同的加压循环模式以及完全或部分减压模式。1个、2个或4个循环的每种模式都包含在连续的20分钟时间段内。在完全加压期间和减压期间,对两种方案(每种方案10名受试者)的皮肤血流灌注进行测定。
大学研究中心。
与基线相关的总体平均皮肤血流灌注。
完全减压产生的皮肤血流灌注明显高于部分减压。然而,无论减压是完全还是部分,每种循环模式的平均皮肤血流灌注均高于基线。
与提出的假设一致,减压循环导致足跟皮肤平均血流灌注大于静息基线。在所研究的健康受试者中,出现这种情况是因为减压期间的充血补偿了加压期间的血流不足。当患者能够产生正常的生理性充血反应时,这些结果是适用的。下一个主要的研究挑战是研究减压循环对充血储备减少的患者的影响。