Clark J Madison, Cook Ted A
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29401-5803, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2002 Jun;112(6):968-74. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200206000-00006.
To describe a novel surgical protocol for the management of patients presenting with extruded nasal implants.
Retrospective chart review.
Analysis of consecutive patients presenting with extruded nasal implants from 1986 to 2000. Patients were selected from a large database of revision rhinoplasty cases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) at least one previous rhinoplasty procedure, 2) an extruded nasal implant that was documented preoperatively, 3) immediate reconstruction that was carried out with irradiated homograft costal cartilage (IHCC), and 4) at least 1 year of follow-up recorded, including standard postoperative rhinoplasty photographs. A total of 18 patients met the inclusion criteria and form the basis of this study. Data gathered from the charts included date of surgery, last date of follow-up, location of implant extrusion, alloplastic material, specific use of IHCC for reconstruction, percent of clinical IHCC resorption at last follow-up, and presence of warping of the IHCC.
All 18 patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes of their nasal reconstructions. The most common extruded alloplast was Silastic, followed by Gore-Tex (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ). There were no cases of extrusion or infection of the IHCC implant subsequent to immediate reconstruction of the extruded alloplast. Clinical resorption of the IHCC was minimal, with a mean follow-up of 26 months. Only one patient had a complication, warpage, resulting in removal of the IHCC. In that patient, the IHCC still had carving markings on the implant after 2 years in vivo.
In this series of patients, a novel surgical protocol was used. The extruded implant was removed and immediate reconstruction with irradiated rib cartilage was done. All patients were evaluated for postoperative infection, graft extrusion, and satisfaction with cosmetic result. There was one major complication in this series of 18 patients, warping of the IHCC, which necessitated removal and replacement. This approach appears to be a reasonable method for reconstruction of extruded nasal alloplasts.
描述一种用于处理鼻植入物外露患者的新型手术方案。
回顾性病历审查。
分析1986年至2000年间连续出现鼻植入物外露的患者。患者选自一个大型鼻整形修复病例数据库。纳入标准为:1)至少有一次先前的鼻整形手术;2)术前记录有鼻植入物外露;3)使用辐照同种异体肋软骨(IHCC)进行即刻重建;4)记录至少1年的随访情况,包括标准的鼻整形术后照片。共有18例患者符合纳入标准并构成本研究的基础。从病历中收集的数据包括手术日期、最后随访日期、植入物外露部位、异体材料、IHCC用于重建的具体情况、最后随访时临床IHCC吸收的百分比以及IHCC的翘曲情况。
所有18例患者对鼻重建的美容效果均满意。最常见的外露异体材料是硅橡胶,其次是戈尔特斯(W.L.戈尔联合公司,亚利桑那州弗拉格斯塔夫)。在即刻重建外露异体材料后,没有IHCC植入物发生挤压或感染的病例。IHCC的临床吸收极少,平均随访26个月。只有1例患者出现并发症,即翘曲,导致IHCC被取出。在该患者中,IHCC在体内放置2年后植入物上仍有雕刻痕迹。
在这组患者中,采用了一种新型手术方案。取出外露的植入物并使用辐照肋软骨进行即刻重建。对所有患者进行术后感染、移植物挤压以及美容效果满意度的评估。在这18例患者中出现了1例主要并发症,即IHCC翘曲,这需要取出并更换。这种方法似乎是重建外露鼻异体材料的一种合理方法。