Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda L, Capasso P, Piccolboni D
Division of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, Via Bianchi 10, Naples, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun;16(6):972-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9007-8. Epub 2002 Mar 26.
Some reports have suggested that laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) can be successfully performed in adults. However, several aspects of this procedure remain as yet undefined; therefore, several attempts have been made to modify the standard technique to try to optimize the procedure. Herein we analyze our experience with 105 laparoscopic splenectomies.
From 1993 to 2000, 105 patients underwent LS at our hospital. Twelve of these patients also underwent a concomitant cholecystectomy. There were 66 women and 39 men whose ages ranged between 4 and 78 years (median, 27.7). All patients underwent an elective laparoscopic splenectomy. Seventy five patients had thrombocytopenia (ITP), 14 had hereditary spherocytosis, eight were affected by b-thalassemia, two had splenic cysts, two had lymphoma, (two had myeloid chronic leukemia, one patient presented with a splenic abscess and one had incurred an iatrogenic spleen lesion during adrenalectomy. The first patients in this series were positioned in dorsal decubitus; however, as the team's experience increased, the right lateral decubitus became the position of choice because it provides better exposure of the splenic hilum. This procedure requires the use of only four trocars.
Mean operating time was 95 min (range, 35-320). Hospital stay ranged from 2 to 21 days (median, 4.5). There was only one conversion to open surgery. One patient died in the postoperative period due to the evolution of a preexisting malignant disease. We recorded nine complications-four subphrenic abscesses, two cases of pleuritis, two episodes of postoperative bleeding, and one intestinal infarction 16 days after surgery. Only two patients needed redo surgery.
We believe that the laparoscopic approach is a valid alternative to open splenectomy, but mastery of some of the technical details of this procedure could greatly help avoid its complications. On the basis of our experience, it seems that the lateral approach should be considered the position of choice because it provides exposure and easier dissection of the splenic hilar structures. We also found that a 30 degrees scope and an ultrasonic dissector allowed for perfect vision and optimal hemostasis during the procedure. At the end of procedure, the spleen should be fragmented and then extracted using an extraction bag.
一些报告表明,成人腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)可以成功实施。然而,该手术的几个方面仍未明确;因此,人们进行了多次尝试来改进标准技术,以试图优化该手术。在此,我们分析了我们105例腹腔镜脾切除术的经验。
1993年至2000年,我院有105例患者接受了LS。其中12例患者同时接受了胆囊切除术。有66名女性和39名男性,年龄在4岁至78岁之间(中位数为27.7岁)。所有患者均接受择期腹腔镜脾切除术。75例患者患有血小板减少症(ITP),14例患有遗传性球形红细胞增多症,8例患有β地中海贫血,2例患有脾囊肿,2例患有淋巴瘤,2例患有慢性髓性白血病,1例患者出现脾脓肿,1例患者在肾上腺切除术期间发生医源性脾损伤。该系列中的首例患者采用仰卧位;然而,随着团队经验的增加,右侧卧位成为首选体位,因为它能更好地暴露脾门。该手术仅需使用四个套管针。
平均手术时间为95分钟(范围为35 - 320分钟)。住院时间为2至21天(中位数为4.5天)。仅1例转为开放手术。1例患者术后因原有恶性疾病进展而死亡。我们记录了9例并发症——4例膈下脓肿、2例胸膜炎、2例术后出血以及1例术后16天的肠梗死。仅2例患者需要再次手术。
我们认为腹腔镜手术是开放性脾切除术的有效替代方法,但掌握该手术的一些技术细节可极大地有助于避免其并发症。根据我们的经验,似乎应将侧卧位视为首选体位,因为它能提供暴露并便于解剖脾门结构。我们还发现,30度的腹腔镜和超声分离器在手术过程中能提供完美的视野并实现最佳止血效果。手术结束时,脾脏应破碎,然后使用取出袋取出。