Wakefield Ian D, Pollard Chris, Redfern William S, Hammond Timothy G, Valentin Jean-Pierre
Safety Assessment UK, AstraZeneca R & D, Aldereley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK, SK10 4TG.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Jun;16(3):209-18. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.00099.x.
The ICH S7A guideline defines safety pharmacology (SP) studies as those that investigate 'the potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects of a substance on physiological functions in relation to exposure in the therapeutic range and above', and permits both in vivo and in vitro techniques, as appropriate. The implementation of these ICH guidelines by the pharmaceutical industry--whilst providing a welcome and long overdue clarity into the scientific rationale, timing and regulatory requirements for SP studies--has also generated new challenges, both logistical and scientific, which have a major impact on drug development. These factors have motivated us to consider the introduction of in vitro techniques at an early stage of SP evaluation. Amongst these factors are: the expanded range of study types and physiological parameters to be assessed, the increased 'front-loading' of SP at earlier stages of the drug discovery process; the greater number of new chemical entities (NCEs) to be tested, together with limited compound supply; the condensed time frames for drug development, the higher and quicker throughput of in vitro vs. in vivo tests; the increasing predictability of in vitro tests and application of the '3Rs' rule of animal welfare (reduction, replacement and refinement). Also, there is the failure of traditional in vivo safety evaluation to predict certain clinical side-effects. The use of molecular (e.g. fluorescence and cloned ion channel), cellular (e.g. patch clamp and isolated cardiac cells) and tissue-based (e.g. microelectrodes and Purkinje fibres) methods offers a wide portfolio of novel techniques for SP evaluation of NCEs at a pre-in vivo stage. Thus, innovative in vitro techniques will contribute significantly to the early SP evaluation of NCEs.
国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)S7A指南将安全性药理学(SP)研究定义为“研究药物在治疗范围及以上暴露时,对生理功能潜在的不良药效学作用”的研究,并酌情允许采用体内和体外技术。制药行业实施这些ICH指南,虽然为SP研究的科学原理、时间安排和监管要求提供了期待已久且令人欢迎的明确指导,但也带来了后勤和科学方面的新挑战,对药物研发产生了重大影响。这些因素促使我们考虑在SP评估的早期阶段引入体外技术。这些因素包括:需评估的研究类型和生理参数范围扩大;在药物发现过程的早期阶段,SP的“前期投入”增加;待测试的新化学实体(NCE)数量增多,同时化合物供应有限;药物研发的时间框架缩短;体外试验比体内试验具有更高且更快的通量;体外试验的可预测性不断提高以及动物福利“3R”原则(减少、替代和优化)的应用。此外,传统的体内安全性评估无法预测某些临床副作用。分子方法(如荧光和克隆离子通道)、细胞方法(如膜片钳和分离的心肌细胞)和基于组织的方法(如微电极和浦肯野纤维)的使用,为在体内前阶段对NCE进行SP评估提供了一系列广泛的新技术。因此,创新的体外技术将对NCE的早期SP评估做出重大贡献。