Matthews Charles E, Ainsworth Barbara E, Thompson Raymond W, Bassett David R
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Norman J. Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Aug;34(8):1376-81. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00021.
To examine sources of variance in objective measures of physical activity in a group of healthy adults (N = 92) participating in a physical activity measurement study.
Physical activity was assessed for up to 21 consecutive days using the Computer Science Applications (CSA) accelerometer. Day-of-the-week effects were evaluated for activity counts (ct.min(-1).d(-1), ct.d(-1)) and time (min.d(-1)) spent in inactivity (0-499 ct), moderate-1 (500-1951 ct), and moderate-2-vigorous activity (> or =1952 ct). Random effects models were employed to estimate variance components for subject, day of the week, and residual error from which the number of days of assessment required to achieve 80% reliability were estimated.
Physical inactivity was lower on weekend days, and Saturday was the least inactive day of the week for both men and women. Inter-individual variation, or differences between subjects, was proportionally the largest source of variance (55-60% of total) in accelerometer counts and time spent in moderate to vigorous activity. Differences within subjects (intra-individual variation) accounted for 30-45% of the overall variance, and day-of-the-week effects accounted for 1-8%. For activity counts, and time spent in moderate to vigorous activity, at least 3-4 d of monitoring were required to achieve 80% reliability. Reliable measures of physical inactivity required at least 7 d of monitoring.
These findings provide insight for understanding the behavioral variability in the activity patterns of adults and suggest that reliable measures of activity behaviors require at least 7 d of monitoring.
在一组参与体力活动测量研究的健康成年人(N = 92)中,研究体力活动客观测量指标的变异来源。
使用计算机科学应用公司(CSA)的加速度计连续21天评估体力活动。对一周中不同日期的效应进行评估,包括活动计数(每分钟计数(ct.min(-1).天(-1))、每天计数(ct.天(-1)))以及在不活动状态(0 - 499 ct)、中度活动1(500 - 1951 ct)和中度至剧烈活动(≥1952 ct)中所花费的时间(分钟.天(-1))。采用随机效应模型估计个体、一周中的日期以及残余误差的方差成分,据此估计达到80%可靠性所需的评估天数。
周末的身体不活动水平较低,对男性和女性而言,周六都是一周中身体最不活跃的一天。个体间差异,即不同受试者之间的差异,在加速度计计数以及中度至剧烈活动所花费的时间方面,按比例是最大的变异来源(占总变异的55 - 60%)。受试者内部差异(个体内变异)占总体变异的30 - 45%,一周中不同日期的效应占1 - 8%。对于活动计数以及中度至剧烈活动所花费的时间,至少需要3 - 4天的监测才能达到80%的可靠性。可靠的身体不活动测量需要至少7天的监测。
这些发现为理解成年人活动模式中的行为变异性提供了见解,并表明可靠的活动行为测量需要至少7天的监测。