• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种面弓的临床与成本效益评估

A clinical and cost-benefit evaluation of five facebows.

作者信息

Samet Nachum, Smidt Ami, Samet Naama, Weiss Ervin Izhak

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):511-5.

PMID:12165986
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although the use of an arbitrary facebow and a full-sized articulator can reduce laboratory errors, many dentists do not use a facebow routinely because the procedure seems to be both intricate and time consuming. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate four earpiece-type facebows and the Snow facebow and to compare the time required for registration, the ease of manipulation, and cost-benefit considerations.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five dentists who routinely used only the Snow facebow were asked, after a brief explanation, to perform registrations with the Snow facebow and four new-generation, earpiece-type facebows. The time required for each facebow registration was recorded. Dentists were also asked to fill out a questionnaire concerning ease of manipulation and cost-benefit factors.

RESULTS

The Quick facebow was the facebow of choice of most of the dentists because of its favorable design and usage characteristics and cost-benefit ratio. The Artex 3-D facebow proved to be both the easiest and the fastest to manipulate. The Spring-bow and the Whip-Mix Quickmount were next in rank, and the Snow facebow scored the lowest.

CONCLUSION

The use of earpiece-type facebows is both simple and fast, and practitioners judged this type of facebow to be superior to the Snow facebow.

摘要

目的

尽管使用任意面弓和全尺寸牙合架可以减少实验室误差,但许多牙医并不常规使用面弓,因为该操作似乎既复杂又耗时。本研究的目的是评估四种耳塞式面弓和斯诺面弓,并比较记录所需时间、操作的难易程度以及成本效益考量。

方法和材料

25名仅常规使用斯诺面弓的牙医在经过简短解释后,被要求使用斯诺面弓和四种新一代耳塞式面弓进行记录。记录每种面弓记录所需的时间。还要求牙医填写一份关于操作难易程度和成本效益因素的问卷。

结果

由于其良好的设计、使用特性和成本效益比,快速面弓是大多数牙医的首选面弓。Artex 3-D面弓被证明是操作最简单、最快的。弹簧弓和Whip-Mix Quickmount次之,斯诺面弓得分最低。

结论

使用耳塞式面弓既简单又快速,从业者认为这种面弓优于斯诺面弓。

相似文献

1
A clinical and cost-benefit evaluation of five facebows.五种面弓的临床与成本效益评估
Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):511-5.
2
Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance?使用任意面弓制作稳定矫治器有什么益处吗?
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):517-22.
3
Digitizing the Facebow: A Clinician/Technician Communication Tool.
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):35-7. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4748.
4
Articulators: should we accept the status quo? A doctor-technician liaison's perspective.牙合架:我们应该维持现状吗?一位医生与技师联络人的观点。
Dent Today. 2006 Dec;25(12):56, 58-9.
5
Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.在面弓转移到半可调架和全可调架时,比较牙合平面的矢状倾斜与法兰克福平面的关系。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
6
Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.两种面弓/半可调牙合架系统用于在上颌牙合架上定位上颌模型的评估:一项初步研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):327-30. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1849.
7
Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: influence of strip thickness and operator experience.牙科实验室中咬合接触的评估:条带厚度和操作人员经验的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2000 May-Jun;13(3):201-4.
8
Interchangeability of semiadjustable articulators after 2 to 7 years of use.
J Prosthodont. 2000 Sep;9(3):142-7.
9
Using articulators to enhance clinical practice.使用牙合架提升临床实践。
Br Dent J. 1998 Mar 28;184(6):272-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809600.
10
[To what extent does the so-called quickmount facebow satisfy clinical requirements for precision?].所谓的快速固定面弓在多大程度上满足临床精度要求?
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1985 Mar;40(3):224-6.

引用本文的文献

1
comparison of the accuracy of an occlusal plane transfer method between facebow and POP bow systems in asymmetric ear position.不对称耳部位置下面弓与全口义齿平面弓系统间咬合平面转移方法准确性的比较
J Adv Prosthodont. 2023 Oct;15(5):271-280. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.5.271. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Influence of the Hinge Axis Transfer Modality on the Three-Dimensional Condylar Shift Between the Centric Relation and the Maximum Intercuspation Positions.铰链轴转移方式对正中关系位与最大牙尖交错位之间髁突三维移位的影响。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015 Mar;49(1):36-44. doi: 10.15644/asc49/1/5.
3
Comparison of selected kinematic facebows applied to mandibular tracing.
应用于下颌描记的选定运动面弓的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:818694. doi: 10.1155/2014/818694. Epub 2014 May 7.