Suppr超能文献

电灼腺样体切除术与刮除术及动力辅助方法的比较。

Electrocautery adenoidectomy compared with curettage and power-assisted methods.

作者信息

Elluru Ravindhra G, Johnson Liane, Myer Charles M

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2002 Aug;112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):23-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.5541121409.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare electrocautery adenoidectomy with conventional (curettage) and power-assisted (endoscopic shaver) methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative review.

METHODS

Prospective and retrospective studies comparing electrocautery adenoidectomy and conventional curettage or power-assisted methods were reviewed to provide direct comparisons regarding specific outcome variables.

RESULTS

Electrocautery adenoidectomy is a precise, effective technique for removing adenoid tissue. Compared with curettage techniques, electrocautery involves less blood loss and shorter operating times. Power-assisted adenoidectomy also offers shorter operating times and less blood loss, but the necessary equipment is more expensive and more experience is required to attain proficiency with the technique.

CONCLUSION

Electrocautery adenoidectomy provides the benefits of minimization of operating time and blood loss at a lower cost than power-assisted adenoidectomy.

摘要

目的

比较电灼腺样体切除术与传统(刮除术)及动力辅助(内镜刨削器)方法。

研究设计

比较性综述。

方法

回顾比较电灼腺样体切除术与传统刮除术或动力辅助方法的前瞻性和回顾性研究,以对特定结局变量进行直接比较。

结果

电灼腺样体切除术是一种精确、有效的腺样体组织切除技术。与刮除术相比,电灼术出血量更少,手术时间更短。动力辅助腺样体切除术同样手术时间短、出血量少,但所需设备更昂贵,且需要更多经验才能熟练掌握该技术。

结论

与动力辅助腺样体切除术相比,电灼腺样体切除术能以更低成本实现手术时间和出血量最小化的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验