Elluru Ravindhra G, Johnson Liane, Myer Charles M
Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2002 Aug;112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):23-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.5541121409.
To compare electrocautery adenoidectomy with conventional (curettage) and power-assisted (endoscopic shaver) methods.
Comparative review.
Prospective and retrospective studies comparing electrocautery adenoidectomy and conventional curettage or power-assisted methods were reviewed to provide direct comparisons regarding specific outcome variables.
Electrocautery adenoidectomy is a precise, effective technique for removing adenoid tissue. Compared with curettage techniques, electrocautery involves less blood loss and shorter operating times. Power-assisted adenoidectomy also offers shorter operating times and less blood loss, but the necessary equipment is more expensive and more experience is required to attain proficiency with the technique.
Electrocautery adenoidectomy provides the benefits of minimization of operating time and blood loss at a lower cost than power-assisted adenoidectomy.
比较电灼腺样体切除术与传统(刮除术)及动力辅助(内镜刨削器)方法。
比较性综述。
回顾比较电灼腺样体切除术与传统刮除术或动力辅助方法的前瞻性和回顾性研究,以对特定结局变量进行直接比较。
电灼腺样体切除术是一种精确、有效的腺样体组织切除技术。与刮除术相比,电灼术出血量更少,手术时间更短。动力辅助腺样体切除术同样手术时间短、出血量少,但所需设备更昂贵,且需要更多经验才能熟练掌握该技术。
与动力辅助腺样体切除术相比,电灼腺样体切除术能以更低成本实现手术时间和出血量最小化的优势。