Madeleine Pascal, Farina Dario, Merletti Roberto, Arendt-Nielsen Lars
Centre for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, Bldg D-3, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Aug;87(4-5):327-36. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0655-8. Epub 2002 Jul 6.
The purposes of this study were firstly to compare and investigate localised fatigue in the upper trapezius muscle in various arm positions as assessed by mechanomyographic (MMG) and surface electromyographic (EMG) signals and secondly to study the effects of different normalisation methods on MMG and EMG signals during non-fatiguing and fatiguing low level isometric contractions. The MMG, EMG and rate of perceived exertion were recorded from 11 subjects in five arm positions (0 degrees abduction and 0 degrees flexion, 45 degrees and 90 degrees flexion, 45 degrees and 90 degrees abduction) with different bilateral arm loads during 3 s for non-fatiguing (0-0.5-1 kg hand-load) and 3 min for fatiguing contractions (1 kg hand-load). The root mean square (RMS), average rectified value (ARV), mean power frequency (MNF), and median power frequency (MDF) of the MMG and EMG signals were computed and normalised with respect to the initial values obtained in the current arm position or in the reference position (0 degrees abduction and 0 degrees flexion) corresponding to the normal postural activity of the trapezius muscle. For fatiguing contractions, differences in magnitude of the increase in the RMS or ARV and decrease in the MNF or MDF were observed for EMG and MMG. The MMG amplitude and spectral changes followed the subjective sensation of fatigue and were not correlated to their EMG counterparts, suggesting that they may reflect different phenomena. For non-fatiguing contractions, normalisation to the current arm position entailed the loss of dynamic amplitude changes suggesting that a single reference contraction in the middle part of the range of movement is enough for proper normalisation of EMG and MMG signals. For fatiguing contractions, normalisation of the EMG and MMG to some extent can lead to a misleading interpretation. Assessment of the upper trapezius muscle by means of MMG may be valuable in ergonomics.
本研究的目的,一是通过肌动图(MMG)和表面肌电图(EMG)信号,比较和研究不同手臂位置上斜方肌的局部疲劳情况;二是研究不同归一化方法对非疲劳和疲劳性低水平等长收缩过程中MMG和EMG信号的影响。在5种手臂位置(外展0度和屈曲0度、屈曲45度和90度、外展45度和90度)下,对11名受试者施加不同的双侧手臂负荷,分别记录3秒非疲劳(手部负荷0 - 0.5 - 1千克)和3分钟疲劳收缩(手部负荷1千克)过程中的MMG、EMG和主观用力感觉。计算MMG和EMG信号的均方根(RMS)、平均整流值(ARV)、平均功率频率(MNF)和中位功率频率(MDF),并相对于当前手臂位置或与斜方肌正常姿势活动相对应的参考位置(外展0度和屈曲0度)获得的初始值进行归一化。对于疲劳收缩,观察到EMG和MMG的RMS或ARV增加幅度以及MNF或MDF降低幅度存在差异。MMG幅度和频谱变化与疲劳的主观感觉一致,且与对应的EMG变化不相关,这表明它们可能反映不同的现象。对于非疲劳收缩,将信号归一化到当前手臂位置会导致动态幅度变化信息丢失,这表明在运动范围中间部分进行一次参考收缩就足以对EMG和MMG信号进行适当归一化。对于疲劳收缩,EMG和MMG的归一化在一定程度上可能会导致误导性解释。通过MMG评估上斜方肌在人体工程学中可能具有重要价值。