Suppr超能文献

胚胎学与进化,1920 - 1960:天壤之别?

Embryology and evolution 1920-1960: worlds apart?

作者信息

Amundson R

机构信息

University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 West Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720, USA.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2000;22(3):335-52.

Abstract

During the early part of the 20th century most embryologists were skeptical about the significance of Mendelian genetics to embryological development. A few embryologists began to study the developmental effects of Mendelian genes around 1940. Such work was a necessary step on the path to modern developmental biology. It occurred during the time when the Evolutionary Synthesis was integrating Mendelian and population genetics into a unified evolutionary theory. Why did the first embryological geneticists begin their study at that particular time? One possible explanation is that developmental genetics was a potential avenue of alliance between embryology and evolutionary biology, two fields that had been separated since the 1890s. To assess this possible motive it is necessary to explore the methodological contrasts that obtained between embryology and both Mendelian-chromosomal genetics and neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. Some of these contrasts persist to the present day.

摘要

在20世纪早期,大多数胚胎学家对孟德尔遗传学在胚胎发育中的重要性持怀疑态度。大约在1940年,一些胚胎学家开始研究孟德尔基因的发育效应。这项工作是通往现代发育生物学道路上的必要一步。它发生在进化综合论将孟德尔遗传学和群体遗传学整合为一个统一的进化理论的时期。为什么第一批胚胎学遗传学家在那个特定时间开始他们的研究呢?一种可能的解释是,发育遗传学是胚胎学和进化生物学之间潜在的联盟途径,这两个领域自19世纪90年代以来就一直相互分离。为了评估这一可能的动机,有必要探究胚胎学与孟德尔 - 染色体遗传学以及新达尔文进化理论之间存在的方法论差异。其中一些差异一直持续到今天。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验