Simons Richard, Kirkpatrick Andrew
Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):288-95.
Optimal care of the injured patient requires the delivery of appropriate, definitive care shortly after injury. Over the last 30 to 40 years, civilian trauma systems and trauma centres have been developed in the United States based on experience gained in military conflicts, particularly in Korea and Vietnam. A similar process is evolving in Canada. National trauma committees in the US and Canada have defined optimal resources to meet the goal of rapid, appropriate care in trauma centres. They have introduced programs (verification or accreditation) to externally audit trauma centre performance based on these guidelines. It is generally accepted that implementing trauma systems results in decreased preventable death and improved survival after trauma. What is less clear is the degree to which each facet of trauma system development contributes to this improvement. The relative importance of national performance guidelines and trauma centre audit as integral steps toward improved outcomes following injury are reviewed. Current Trauma Association of Canada guidelines for trauma centres are presented and the process of trauma centre accreditation is discussed.
对受伤患者的最佳护理需要在受伤后不久提供适当的确定性治疗。在过去的30到40年里,美国根据在军事冲突(特别是在朝鲜和越南)中获得的经验,建立了民用创伤系统和创伤中心。加拿大也在经历类似的发展过程。美国和加拿大的国家创伤委员会已经确定了最佳资源,以实现创伤中心快速、适当护理的目标。他们引入了一些项目(验证或认证),以便根据这些指导方针对外审核创伤中心的表现。人们普遍认为,实施创伤系统可降低可预防的死亡率,并提高创伤后的生存率。目前尚不清楚的是,创伤系统发展的每个方面对这种改善的贡献程度如何。本文回顾了国家绩效指南和创伤中心审核作为受伤后改善治疗效果的重要步骤的相对重要性。介绍了加拿大创伤协会目前针对创伤中心的指南,并讨论了创伤中心认证的过程。