Dupont Grégory, Blondel Nicolas, Lensel Ghislaine, Berthoin Serge
Laboratoire d'Etudes de la Motricité Humaine, Faculté des Sciences du Sport et de l'Education Physique, Université de Lille 2, France.
Can J Appl Physiol. 2002 Apr;27(2):103-15. doi: 10.1139/h02-008.
This study was designed to determine the intermittent critical velocity, the time spent at maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and the time spent above 90% of VO2max for short intermittent runs of 15 s at supramaximal velocities, alternating with 15 s of passive recovery. Nine male subjects performed 5 field-tests to exhaustion (tlim): 4 intermittent runs at 110%, 120%, 130% and 140% of maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and 1 continuous run at 100% of MAS. Results have shown the mean intermittent critical velocity (4.82 +/- 0.41 m.s-1) was not significantly different from MAS (4.63 +/- 0.37 m.s-1). Intermittent runs at 110% and 120% of MAS and the continuous run at 100% of MAS lead all subjects to reach VO2max. However, intermittent runs at 120% of MAS (202 +/- 66 s) allowed subjects to spend a significantly longer time at VO2max (p < .05) than intermittent runs at 110% (116 +/- 42 s), 130% (50 +/- 47 s), 140% (48 +/- 59 s) of MAS and continuous run at 100% of MAS (120 +/- 42 s). The time spent between 90 and 100% of VO2max was significantly longer (p < .05) for intermittent runs at 110% (383 +/- 180 s) and for 120% (323 +/- 272 s) of MAS than for intermittent runs at 130% (135 +/- 133 s), 140% of MAS (77 +/- 96 s) and for continuous run at 100% of MAS (217 +/- 114 s). Consequently, this kind of intermittent exercise with intensities from intermittent critical velocity to 120% of MAS could be introduced in a training program when the purpose is to increase VO2max.
本研究旨在确定间歇性临界速度、在最大摄氧量(VO₂max)下花费的时间以及在超最大速度下进行15秒短间歇跑且交替进行15秒被动恢复时,在超过VO₂max的90%水平下花费的时间。九名男性受试者进行了5次力竭性的现场测试(tlim):4次以最大有氧速度(MAS)的110%、120%、130%和140%进行间歇跑,以及1次以MAS的100%进行持续跑。结果表明,平均间歇性临界速度(4.82±0.41米·秒⁻¹)与MAS(4.63±0.37米·秒⁻¹)无显著差异。以MAS的110%和120%进行间歇跑以及以MAS的100%进行持续跑使所有受试者达到了VO₂max。然而,以MAS的120%进行间歇跑(202±66秒)时,受试者在VO₂max下花费的时间比以MAS的110%(116±42秒)、130%(50±47秒)、140%(48±59秒)进行间歇跑以及以MAS的100%进行持续跑(120±42秒)时显著更长(p<0.05)。对于以MAS的110%(383±180秒)和120%(323±272秒)进行间歇跑,在VO₂max的90%至100%之间花费的时间比以MAS的130%(135±133秒)、140%(77±96秒)进行间歇跑以及以MAS的100%进行持续跑(217±114秒)时显著更长(p<0.05)。因此,当目的是提高VO₂max时,这种强度从间歇性临界速度到MAS的120%的间歇运动可纳入训练计划。