Suppr超能文献

在超最大速度下进行短时间间歇跑时的临界速度以及在高水平摄氧量下所花费的时间。

Critical velocity and time spent at a high level of VO2 for short intermittent runs at supramaximal velocities.

作者信息

Dupont Grégory, Blondel Nicolas, Lensel Ghislaine, Berthoin Serge

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Etudes de la Motricité Humaine, Faculté des Sciences du Sport et de l'Education Physique, Université de Lille 2, France.

出版信息

Can J Appl Physiol. 2002 Apr;27(2):103-15. doi: 10.1139/h02-008.

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the intermittent critical velocity, the time spent at maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and the time spent above 90% of VO2max for short intermittent runs of 15 s at supramaximal velocities, alternating with 15 s of passive recovery. Nine male subjects performed 5 field-tests to exhaustion (tlim): 4 intermittent runs at 110%, 120%, 130% and 140% of maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and 1 continuous run at 100% of MAS. Results have shown the mean intermittent critical velocity (4.82 +/- 0.41 m.s-1) was not significantly different from MAS (4.63 +/- 0.37 m.s-1). Intermittent runs at 110% and 120% of MAS and the continuous run at 100% of MAS lead all subjects to reach VO2max. However, intermittent runs at 120% of MAS (202 +/- 66 s) allowed subjects to spend a significantly longer time at VO2max (p < .05) than intermittent runs at 110% (116 +/- 42 s), 130% (50 +/- 47 s), 140% (48 +/- 59 s) of MAS and continuous run at 100% of MAS (120 +/- 42 s). The time spent between 90 and 100% of VO2max was significantly longer (p < .05) for intermittent runs at 110% (383 +/- 180 s) and for 120% (323 +/- 272 s) of MAS than for intermittent runs at 130% (135 +/- 133 s), 140% of MAS (77 +/- 96 s) and for continuous run at 100% of MAS (217 +/- 114 s). Consequently, this kind of intermittent exercise with intensities from intermittent critical velocity to 120% of MAS could be introduced in a training program when the purpose is to increase VO2max.

摘要

本研究旨在确定间歇性临界速度、在最大摄氧量(VO₂max)下花费的时间以及在超最大速度下进行15秒短间歇跑且交替进行15秒被动恢复时,在超过VO₂max的90%水平下花费的时间。九名男性受试者进行了5次力竭性的现场测试(tlim):4次以最大有氧速度(MAS)的110%、120%、130%和140%进行间歇跑,以及1次以MAS的100%进行持续跑。结果表明,平均间歇性临界速度(4.82±0.41米·秒⁻¹)与MAS(4.63±0.37米·秒⁻¹)无显著差异。以MAS的110%和120%进行间歇跑以及以MAS的100%进行持续跑使所有受试者达到了VO₂max。然而,以MAS的120%进行间歇跑(202±66秒)时,受试者在VO₂max下花费的时间比以MAS的110%(116±42秒)、130%(50±47秒)、140%(48±59秒)进行间歇跑以及以MAS的100%进行持续跑(120±42秒)时显著更长(p<0.05)。对于以MAS的110%(383±180秒)和120%(323±272秒)进行间歇跑,在VO₂max的90%至100%之间花费的时间比以MAS的130%(135±133秒)、140%(77±96秒)进行间歇跑以及以MAS的100%进行持续跑(217±114秒)时显著更长(p<0.05)。因此,当目的是提高VO₂max时,这种强度从间歇性临界速度到MAS的120%的间歇运动可纳入训练计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验