Perez E A, Geeraerts L, Suman V J, Adjei A A, Baron A T, Hatfield A K, Maihle N, Michalak J C, Kuross S A, Kugler J W, Lafky J M, Ingle J N
Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ann Oncol. 2002 Aug;13(8):1225-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf222.
Docetaxel has yielded promising response rates as a component of doxorubicin-based combination schedules in patients with metastatic breast cancer, including docetaxel/doxorubicin and docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC). This randomized two-stage phase II study was conducted to evaluate sequential treatment with docetaxel and AC as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
Thirty-three patients were randomized to either docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles followed by AC (60/600 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles (n = 17) or vice-versa (n = 16), without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. In addition, we compared pre-treatment serum sErbB1 and sErbB2 protein concentrations with that of an age- and menopausal status-matched group of healthy women, and examined changes in serum sErbB1 and sErbB2 protein concentrations in these two treatment schedules. Data from each one of the two arms of the trial (docetaxel then AC, or AC and then docetaxel) were analyzed separately.
Enrollment was suspended after the first-stage of accrual, based on statistical design. Confirmed objective response rates after six cycles of treatment were 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 62%] with docetaxel then AC and 38% (95% CI 15% to 65%) with AC then docetaxel. Dose reductions were frequent and mostly due to grade 4 neutropenia. Median survival time was 2.5 years in the docetaxel then AC group, and 1.1 years in the AC then docetaxel group. Serum sErbB1 concentrations were not significantly different between the study patients and healthy women, and did not change significantly after three and six cycles of treatment. In contrast, serum sErbB2 concentrations were significantly higher in the study patients compared with healthy women and tended to decrease after three and six cycles of treatment.
Response rates at the end of six cycles of treatment, which led to termination of accrual after the first stage using either the sequence of docetaxel first or docetaxel after AC chemotherapy, were lower than anticipated. However, median survival times and median progression-free survival times are similar to those reported in other studies. These data further suggest that additional studies to assess whether serum sErbB2 concentrations are useful predictors of responsiveness to chemotherapy are warranted.
多西他赛作为转移性乳腺癌患者基于阿霉素联合方案的组成部分,已产生了令人鼓舞的缓解率,包括多西他赛/阿霉素和多西他赛/阿霉素/环磷酰胺(AC)。这项随机两阶段II期研究旨在评估多西他赛和AC序贯治疗作为一线治疗方案,用于先前未接受过转移性疾病化疗的复发或转移性乳腺癌患者。
33例患者被随机分为两组,一组在21天周期的第1天接受多西他赛(100mg/m²),共三个周期,随后在21天周期的第1天接受AC(60/600mg/m²),共三个周期(n = 17);另一组顺序相反(n = 16),均不给予预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子支持。此外,我们将治疗前血清sErbB1和sErbB2蛋白浓度与年龄和绝经状态匹配的健康女性组进行比较,并研究这两种治疗方案中血清sErbB1和sErbB2蛋白浓度的变化。试验的两个组(先多西他赛后AC,或先AC后多西他赛)的数据分别进行分析。
根据统计设计,在第一阶段入组后研究暂停。六个周期治疗后的确认客观缓解率,先多西他赛后AC组为35%[95%置信区间(CI)14%至62%],先AC后多西他赛组为38%(95%CI 15%至65%)。剂量减少频繁,主要原因是4级中性粒细胞减少。先多西他赛后AC组的中位生存时间为2.5年,先AC后多西他赛组为1.1年。研究患者与健康女性之间的血清sErbB1浓度无显著差异,且在三个和六个周期治疗后无显著变化。相比之下,研究患者的血清sErbB2浓度显著高于健康女性,且在三个和六个周期治疗后有下降趋势。
六个周期治疗结束时的缓解率低于预期,这导致在第一阶段使用先多西他赛或AC化疗后多西他赛的顺序进行入组后研究终止。然而,中位生存时间和中位无进展生存时间与其他研究报道的相似。这些数据进一步表明,有必要进行额外的研究来评估血清sErbB2浓度是否是化疗反应性的有用预测指标。