Hall Jennifer, Dodd Sheri, Durkin Michael, Sloan Sheldon
Manag Care. 2002 Jul;11(7 Suppl):14-8.
To determine proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment patterns and their effect on costs related to gastroesophageal reflux disease.
This study used claims data to identify continuously enrolled subjects diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and newly treated with a PPI between Oct. 1, 1999 and March 31, 2000. Data were analyzed for 6 months following PPI initiation. Results were stratified by first PPI filled during the study period. Compliance (as measured by a medication-possession ratio), dosage escalation (> 25 percent of initial dose), and daily average consumption (DACON) were measured. Regression analysis was performed on GERD-related costs using treatment patterns, type of PPI drug, and compliance as independent variables of interest.
Of 75,452 subjects, there were 51,232 (67.9 percent) lansoprazole, 22,829 (30.3 percent) omeprazole, and 1,391 (1.8 percent) rabeprazole subjects. The possession ratio was not significantly different by drug. Only 3.5 percent of rabeprazole subjects escalated versus 5.5 percent of omeprazole subjects and 9.3 percent of lansoprazole subjects (p = .0001). Among subjects with esophageal ulcer or hiatal hernia, rabeprazole users had a significantly lower final DACON (1.03) versus both lansoprazole (1.20) and omeprazole subjects (1.22, p = .0299). Subjects who were compliant with therapy (ratio > 0.80) had 43 percent higher GERD-related pharmacy costs and 33 percent higher GERD-related total costs (both p < .001). GERD-related medical costs were not significantly affected by compliance. Subjects who filled lansoprazole prescriptions had 9.4 percent higher GERD-related pharmacy costs versus rabeprazole subjects (p < .01). Omeprazole subjects had 12.5 percent higher GERD-related total costs versus rabeprazole subjects (p < .01), while lansoprazole subjects had 18 percent higher GERD-related total costs versus rabeprazole subjects (p < .001).
Rabeprazole subjects had lower GERD-related costs, less escalation, and lower DACON (measured as number of tablets consumed per day), compared to lansoprazole and omeprazole subjects. Compliance was not significantly different between the drugs, nor did increased compliance decrease GERD-related costs.
确定质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的治疗模式及其对胃食管反流病相关费用的影响。
本研究使用索赔数据来识别在1999年10月1日至2000年3月31日期间连续登记诊断为胃食管反流病(GERD)并开始新使用PPI治疗的受试者。在开始使用PPI后的6个月内对数据进行分析。结果按研究期间首次使用的PPI进行分层。测量依从性(以药物持有率衡量)、剂量增加(超过初始剂量的25%)和每日平均消耗量(DACON)。使用治疗模式、PPI药物类型和依从性作为感兴趣的自变量,对GERD相关费用进行回归分析。
在75452名受试者中,有51232名(67.9%)使用兰索拉唑,22829名(30.3%)使用奥美拉唑,1391名(1.8%)使用雷贝拉唑。不同药物的持有率无显著差异。雷贝拉唑使用者中只有3.5%增加了剂量,而奥美拉唑使用者为5.5%,兰索拉唑使用者为9.3%(p = 0.0001)。在患有食管溃疡或食管裂孔疝的受试者中,雷贝拉唑使用者的最终DACON(1.03)显著低于兰索拉唑使用者(1.20)和奥美拉唑使用者(1.22,p = 0.0299)。依从治疗的受试者(比率>0.80)的GERD相关药房费用高出43%,GERD相关总费用高出33%(均p < 0.001)。GERD相关医疗费用未受依从性显著影响。开具兰索拉唑处方的受试者的GERD相关药房费用比雷贝拉唑使用者高9.4%(p < 0.01)。奥美拉唑使用者的GERD相关总费用比雷贝拉唑使用者高12.5%(p < 0.01),而兰索拉唑使用者的GERD相关总费用比雷贝拉唑使用者高18%(p < 0.001)。
与兰索拉唑和奥美拉唑使用者相比,雷贝拉唑使用者的GERD相关费用更低,剂量增加更少,DACON更低(以每天消耗的片剂数量衡量)。不同药物之间的依从性无显著差异,依从性增加也未降低GERD相关费用。