Suppr超能文献

脊髓刺激与替代疗法治疗慢性疼痛的成本效益分析

Treatment of chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation versus alternative therapies: cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Kumar Krishna, Malik Samaad, Demeria Denny

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Regina General Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):106-15; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200207000-00016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is limited available research measuring the cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), compared with best medical treatment/conventional pain therapy (CPT). The purpose of this study was to tabulate the actual costs (in Canadian dollars) for a consecutive series of patients treated with SCS in a constant health care delivery environment and to compare the costs with those for a control group treated in the same controlled environment.

METHODS

We present a consecutive series of 104 patients with failed back syndrome. Within this group, 60 patients underwent SCS electrode implantation, whereas 44 patients were designated as control subjects. We monitored these patients for a 5-year period and tabulated the actual costs incurred in diagnostic imaging, professional fees paid to physicians, implantation (including the costs for hardware), nursing visits for maintenance of the stimulators, physiotherapy, chiropractic treatments, massage therapy, and hospitalization for treatment of breakthrough pain. From these data, the cumulative costs for each group were calculated for a 5-year period. An analysis of Oswestry questionnaire results was also performed, to evaluate the effects of treatment on the quality of life.

RESULTS

The actual mean cumulative cost for SCS therapy for a 5-year period was $29,123/patient, compared with $38,029 for CPT. The cost of treatment for the SCS group was greater than that for the CPT group in the first 2.5 years. The costs of treating patients with SCS became less than those for CPT after that period and remained so during the rest of the follow-up period. In addition, 15% of SCS-treated patients were able to return to employment, because of superior pain control and lower drug intake. No patients in the control group were able to return to employment of any kind.

CONCLUSION

SCS is cost-effective in the long term, despite the initial high costs of the implantable devices.

摘要

目的

与最佳药物治疗/传统疼痛疗法(CPT)相比,测量脊髓刺激(SCS)成本效益的现有研究有限。本研究的目的是列出在持续的医疗服务环境中接受SCS治疗的一系列连续患者的实际成本(以加元计),并将这些成本与在相同对照环境中治疗的对照组的成本进行比较。

方法

我们呈现了一系列连续的104例腰椎术后失败综合征患者。在该组中,60例患者接受了SCS电极植入,而44例患者被指定为对照对象。我们对这些患者进行了5年的监测,并列出了诊断成像、支付给医生的专业费用、植入(包括硬件成本)、刺激器维护的护理访视、物理治疗、脊椎按摩治疗、按摩疗法以及突破性疼痛治疗的住院费用等实际成本。根据这些数据,计算了每组5年期间的累计成本。还进行了Oswestry问卷结果分析,以评估治疗对生活质量的影响。

结果

SCS治疗5年期间的实际平均累计成本为每位患者29,123加元,而CPT为38,029加元。SCS组的治疗成本在前2.5年高于CPT组。在此之后,SCS治疗患者的成本低于CPT组,并在后续随访期的其余时间保持这种情况。此外,由于更好的疼痛控制和更低的药物摄入量,15%接受SCS治疗的患者能够重返工作岗位。对照组中没有患者能够从事任何形式的工作。

结论

尽管可植入设备的初始成本较高,但SCS从长期来看具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验