McDaniel J, Durstine J L, Hand G A, Martin J C
Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Sep;93(3):823-8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00982.2001.
The metabolic cost of producing submaximal cycling power has been reported to vary with pedaling rate. Pedaling rate, however, governs two physiological phenomena known to influence metabolic cost and efficiency: muscle shortening velocity and the frequency of muscle activation and relaxation. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative influence of those two phenomena on metabolic cost during submaximal cycling. Nine trained male cyclists performed submaximal cycling at power outputs intended to elicit 30, 60, and 90% of their individual lactate threshold at four pedaling rates (40, 60, 80, 100 rpm) with three different crank lengths (145, 170, and 195 mm). The combination of four pedaling rates and three crank lengths produced 12 pedal speeds ranging from 0.61 to 2.04 m/s. Metabolic cost was determined by indirect calorimetery, and power output and pedaling rate were recorded. A stepwise multiple linear regression procedure selected mechanical power output, pedal speed, and pedal speed squared as the main determinants of metabolic cost (R(2) = 0.99 +/- 0.01). Neither pedaling rate nor crank length significantly contributed to the regression model. The cost of unloaded cycling and delta efficiency were 150 metabolic watts and 24.7%, respectively, when data from all crank lengths and pedal speeds were included in a regression. Those values increased with increasing pedal speed and ranged from a low of 73 +/- 7 metabolic watts and 22.1 +/- 0.3% (145-mm cranks, 40 rpm) to a high of 297 +/- 23 metabolic watts and 26.6 +/- 0.7% (195-mm cranks, 100 rpm). These results suggest that mechanical power output and pedal speed, a marker for muscle shortening velocity, are the main determinants of metabolic cost during submaximal cycling, whereas pedaling rate (i.e., activation-relaxation rate) does not significantly contribute to metabolic cost.
据报道,产生次最大骑行功率的代谢成本会随着蹬踏频率而变化。然而,蹬踏频率控制着两种已知会影响代谢成本和效率的生理现象:肌肉缩短速度以及肌肉激活和放松的频率。本研究的目的是确定这两种现象在次最大骑行过程中对代谢成本的相对影响。九名训练有素的男性自行车运动员在四种蹬踏频率(40、60、80、100转/分钟)下,以旨在引发其个体乳酸阈值的30%、60%和90%的功率输出进行次最大骑行,使用三种不同的曲柄长度(145、170和195毫米)。四种蹬踏频率和三种曲柄长度的组合产生了12种踏板速度,范围从0.61到2.04米/秒。通过间接量热法测定代谢成本,并记录功率输出和蹬踏频率。逐步多元线性回归程序选择机械功率输出、踏板速度和踏板速度的平方作为代谢成本的主要决定因素(R² = 0.99 ± 0.01)。蹬踏频率和曲柄长度对回归模型均无显著贡献。当将所有曲柄长度和踏板速度的数据纳入回归时,无负荷骑行的成本和效率增量分别为150代谢瓦和24.7%。这些值随着踏板速度的增加而增加,范围从低至73 ± 7代谢瓦和22.1 ± 0.3%(145毫米曲柄,40转/分钟)到高至297 ± 23代谢瓦和26.6 ± 0.7%(195毫米曲柄,100转/分钟)。这些结果表明,机械功率输出和踏板速度(肌肉缩短速度的一个指标)是次最大骑行过程中代谢成本的主要决定因素,而蹬踏频率(即激活-放松频率)对代谢成本没有显著贡献。