• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A new frame for frame-of-reference training: enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers.

作者信息

Schleicher Deidra J, Day David V, Mayes Bronston T, Riggio Ronald E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104-3189, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):735-46. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.735.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.735
PMID:12184577
Abstract

The authors undertook a comprehensive examination of the construct validity of an assessment center in this study by (a) gathering many different types of evidence to evaluate the strength of the inference between predictor measures and constructs (e.g., reliability, accuracy, convergent and discriminant relationships), (b) introducing a theoretically relevant intervention (frame-of-reference [FOR] training) aimed at improving construct validity, and (c) examining the effect of this intervention on criterion-related validity (something heretofore unexamined in the assessment center literature). Results from 58 assessees and 122 assessors suggested that FOR training was effective at improving the reliability, accuracy, convergent and discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity of assessment center ratings. Findings are discussed in terms of implications and future directions for both FOR training and assessment center practice.

摘要

相似文献

1
A new frame for frame-of-reference training: enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers.
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):735-46. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.735.
2
Trying to understand the different pieces of the construct validity puzzle of assessment centers: an examination of assessor and assessee effects.试图理解评估中心建构效度难题的不同组成部分:对评估者和被评估者效应的考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):675-86. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.675.
3
Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.伪装与尽责性的有效性:蒙特卡洛调查
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):140-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.140.
4
Evaluating frame-of-reference rater training effectiveness using performance schema accuracy.使用绩效模式准确性评估参照系评分者培训效果。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1336-44. doi: 10.1037/a0016476.
5
Incremental validity of person-organization fit over the Big Five personality measures.个体-组织契合度比五大人格特质测量更具有增量有效性。
J Psychol. 2012 Sep-Oct;146(5):485-509. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.656154.
6
An application of the situational interview to selection of nursing personnel.情景面试在护理人员选拔中的应用。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2000 Sep;16(9):476-85.
7
A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence.一个关于求职面试有效性的反直觉假设及一些支持证据。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Jun;89(3):553-61. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.553.
8
Situational bandwidth and the criterion-related validity of assessment center ratings: is cross-exercise convergence always desirable?情境带宽与评价中心评分的效标关联效度:跨测评的聚合是否总是可取的?
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):282-95. doi: 10.1037/a0035213. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
9
Resolving the assessment center construct validity problem (as we know it).解决评估中心构念效度问题(就我们所知)。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jan;99(1):38-47. doi: 10.1037/a0034147. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: a large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies.
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1202-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1202.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of online frame-of-reference training on assessment accuracy in the objective structured clinical examination for physical therapy students.在线参照框架训练对物理治疗专业学生客观结构化临床考试评估准确性的影响。
Fujita Med J. 2023 Nov;9(4):288-294. doi: 10.20407/fmj.2022-032. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Does effectiveness in performance appraisal improve with rater training?绩效考核的有效性是否会随着评估者培训的增加而提高?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222694. eCollection 2019.
3
Resident Practice Audit in Gastroenterology (RPAGE): an innovative approach to trainee evaluation and professional development in medicine.
胃肠病学住院医师实践评估(RPAGE):医学培训生评估和专业发展的创新方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Jul 24;10(3):e72-e77. eCollection 2019 Jul.