Braundmeier Andrea G, Demers Jill M, Shanks Roger D, Saacke Richard G, Miller David J
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
J Androl. 2002 Sep-Oct;23(5):645-51.
Despite the development of many new techniques, laboratory assays still do not predict male fertility accurately. To identify targets for laboratory assessment, we first need to determine which steps in fertilization are most often defective in subfertile males. We developed a competitive in vitro fertilization assay in which spermatozoa from 2 different males, stained with different lipophilic dyes, are incubated together with oocytes in a droplet. By exposing mixed spermatozoa to the same oocytes, this assay controls for many of the variables of in vitro fertilization and should allow identification of the most common faulty steps in fertilization. The relationship of zona-binding ability to fertility is controversial. Therefore, as a first step, we determined if zona pellucida-binding ability, measured by this competitive assay, was related to bovine spermatozoal fertility. Fertility data were collected from 2 groups of bulls by 2 means of evaluation, nonreturn to estrus rates postinsemination and competitive insemination. In the nonreturn to estrus study, semen samples from 15 bulls were effectively ranked by zona-binding ability, using pairwise competitive in vitro zona-binding assays (R(2) = 0.84). However, this ranking was not significantly correlated with nonreturn rates (r = -0.04). In the competitive insemination study, semen samples from 8 bulls were effectively ranked by pairwise comparison using the competitive zona-binding assay (R(2) = 0.67). Again, this ranking was not significantly correlated to the competitive insemination index calculated for these bulls (r = 0.29). In the third study, we tested 3 bulls to determine if in vivo zona binding, assessed by the number of accessory spermatozoa, was correlated with in vitro zona binding. The number of accessory spermatozoa on oocytes recovered from cows after mating was not correlated with in vitro competitive binding of the spermatozoa. In conclusion, in vitro competitive zona binding was not correlated with bovine fertility or binding of accessory spermatozoa to oocytes in vivo.
尽管已开发出许多新技术,但实验室检测仍无法准确预测男性生育能力。为了确定实验室评估的目标,我们首先需要确定在受精过程中哪些步骤在亚生育男性中最常出现缺陷。我们开发了一种竞争性体外受精检测方法,其中来自2个不同男性的精子用不同的亲脂性染料染色,然后与卵母细胞在一滴溶液中共同孵育。通过将混合精子暴露于相同的卵母细胞,该检测方法控制了体外受精的许多变量,并应有助于识别受精过程中最常见的错误步骤。透明带结合能力与生育能力的关系存在争议。因此,作为第一步,我们通过这种竞争性检测方法来确定透明带结合能力是否与牛精子的生育能力相关。通过两种评估方式从两组公牛收集生育数据,即人工授精后的返情率和竞争性人工授精。在返情研究中,使用成对竞争性体外透明带结合检测方法,根据透明带结合能力对15头公牛的精液样本进行了有效排序(R(2) = 0.84)。然而,这种排序与返情率没有显著相关性(r = -0.04)。在竞争性人工授精研究中,使用竞争性透明带结合检测方法通过成对比较对8头公牛的精液样本进行了有效排序(R(2) = 0.67)。同样,这种排序与为这些公牛计算的竞争性人工授精指数没有显著相关性(r = 0.29)。在第三个研究中,我们测试了3头公牛,以确定通过副精子数量评估的体内透明带结合是否与体外透明带结合相关。交配后从母牛体内回收的卵母细胞上的副精子数量与精子的体外竞争性结合无关。总之,体外竞争性透明带结合与牛的生育能力或副精子在体内与卵母细胞的结合无关。