Towers Craig V, Briggs Gerald G
Department of Perinatology, Long Beach Memorial Women's Hospital, California, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;187(2):495-500. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124277.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of early-onset neonatal sepsis and the presence of antibiotic resistance of the isolated bacteria and its relationship to antibiotic chemoprophylaxis that occurred during the 4 years that followed the publication of the most recent group B streptococcal guidelines.
A prospective cohort study was performed between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2000. All cases of early-onset neonatal sepsis were gathered prospectively. Data concerning the use of antepartum antibiotics, the isolated bacteria, and the presence of drug resistance were collected. These data were analyzed separately and were combined with published data from the preceding 6 years.
A total of 26 cases of blood culture-proved early-onset neonatal sepsis occurred during the current 4-year study period. Group B Streptococcus was responsible for 10 cases, and the remaining 16 cases were non-group B streptococcal organisms. Of these 16 cases, 11 parturients received antibiotic chemoprophylaxis, and 10 of the isolates (91%) were resistant to the drug that was administered, compared with only one resistant bacteria (20%) in the 5 parturients who did not receive treatment (P =.01). In combining these 16 cases with the cases from the preceding 6 years, a total of 43 cases of non-group B streptococcal sepsis occurred in 49,788 deliveries. Of these, 26 mothers were given antepartum antibiotics, and 23 of the bacterial isolates (88%) exhibited resistance, compared with only 3 of the 17 cases (18%) in which antibiotics were not dispensed (P <.00001). However, because the overall use of antepartum antibiotics increased over time, the attack rate for early-onset group B Streptococcus significantly decreased by 75% (P <.000001).
When early-onset neonatal sepsis develops in a case in which antepartum chemoprophylaxis was used, the bacterial isolate will most likely demonstrate resistance to the antibiotic that was administered. However, the development of early-onset group B streptococcal neonatal sepsis significantly decreased as the use of antepartum antibiotics increased. Thus, the number of prevented infections from antepartum antibiotic use may still outweigh the problems that are seen when resistant bacterial infections arise. Nevertheless, based on the current protocols, a large number of parturients are candidates for antibiotic chemoprophylaxis and this, in conjunction with the global concern of bacterial drug resistance, should be motivation to examine alternative methods, such as vaginal washing or immunotherapy, for decreasing infection.
本研究旨在分析早发型新生儿败血症的发病率、分离出细菌的抗生素耐药性情况及其与最新B族链球菌指南发布后4年期间发生的抗生素化学预防的关系。
1997年1月1日至2000年12月31日进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。前瞻性收集所有早发型新生儿败血症病例。收集有关产前抗生素使用、分离出的细菌以及耐药性存在情况的数据。这些数据分别进行分析,并与前6年已发表的数据相结合。
在当前4年的研究期间,共发生26例血培养证实的早发型新生儿败血症。B族链球菌导致10例,其余16例为非B族链球菌微生物。在这16例中,11名产妇接受了抗生素化学预防,其中10株分离菌(91%)对所使用的药物耐药,而未接受治疗的5名产妇中只有1株耐药菌(20%)(P = 0.01)。将这16例与前6年的病例相结合,在49788例分娩中,共发生43例非B族链球菌败血症。其中,26名母亲接受了产前抗生素治疗,23株细菌分离株(88%)表现出耐药性,而未使用抗生素的17例中只有3例(18%)耐药(P < 0.00001)。然而,由于产前抗生素的总体使用随时间增加,早发型B族链球菌的发病率显著下降了75%(P < 0.000001)。
当在使用产前化学预防的情况下发生早发型新生儿败血症时,分离出的细菌很可能对所使用的抗生素耐药。然而,随着产前抗生素使用的增加,早发型B族链球菌新生儿败血症的发生率显著下降。因此,产前抗生素使用预防的感染数量可能仍超过出现耐药细菌感染时所面临的问题。尽管如此,根据当前方案,大量产妇是抗生素化学预防的适用对象,结合全球对细菌耐药性的关注,这应该促使人们研究替代方法,如阴道冲洗或免疫疗法,以减少感染。