Khan M A, Sidiqui P M
G Batteriol Virol Immunol. 1979 Jan-Jun;72(1-6):21-7.
The sputa of 303 cases who were admitted at Ojha Sanitaurium Karachi were studied for comparing the efficacy and reliability of the three pretreatment methods including the standard method, and those recommended by Nassau (1958) and Becker (1916). Out of the total 223 cases were found to be positive after cultivation on LJ medium out of which 142 were found positive with ZNCF staining while in 81 cases no AFB could be detected. The number of cases found to be positive with standard method, Becker's method and Nassau's method were 117,131, and 147 respectively. As to the contamination, 58 were encountered with standard method, 25 with Becker's method and 84 with Nassau's method. 128 negatives were observed with the standard method, and 147 and 72 with Becker's method and Nassau's method respectively. The merits and demerits of the three methods are discussed.
对在卡拉奇奥贾疗养院收治的303例患者的痰液进行了研究,以比较三种预处理方法(包括标准方法以及纳索(1958年)和贝克尔(1916年)推荐的方法)的有效性和可靠性。在总共223例患者中,经罗-琴培养基培养后发现呈阳性,其中142例经齐-尼氏染色法检测呈阳性,而81例未检测到抗酸杆菌。经标准方法、贝克尔方法和纳索方法检测呈阳性的病例数分别为117例、131例和147例。关于污染情况,标准方法出现58例,贝克尔方法出现25例,纳索方法出现84例。标准方法观察到128例阴性,贝克尔方法和纳索方法分别观察到147例和72例阴性。讨论了这三种方法的优缺点。