Griffith John R, Warden Gail L, Neighbors Kamilah, Shim Beth
J Health Adm Educ. 2002 Winter;20(1):75-98.
Management of health care organizations must improve to meet the well-documented challenges of quality improvement and cost control. Other industries have developed the tools--entry education, mentoring, planned mid-career formal education and experience, and special programs for senior management. The purpose of this paper is to pilot test an alternative method to identify competencies and performance of health care executives. We propose using formal lists of technical, interpersonal, and strategic competencies and specific real events chosen by the respondent to identify and prioritize competencies. Results of a trial with 30 large health care system CEOs and 15 early careerists demonstrate that the method reveals useful depth and detail about managers' educational needs. The results suggest that current thinking about managerial education and learning patterns may be seriously inadequate in several respects. The continued improvement of U.S. health care is a pressing national concern. Quality of care is highly variable and substantially deficient in many institutions (Chassin and Galvin 1998; Committee on Quality of Health Care in America 2001). "Quality improvement should be the essential business strategy for healthcare in the 21st century (Kizer 2001)." Productivity improvements will be essential to balance cost pressures from an aging population and growing technology (Heffler, et al. 2002). Skillful management is necessary to improve quality and productivity. Teams of dozens of caregivers are often required to improve a patient's health. The organizations that provide care have grown larger in response to the greater cost, complexity of operation and finance, and evidence of the success of scale in other industries. While many small professional practices, hospitals, and nursing homes remain, consolidation has created a few dozen provider and intermediary organizations exceeding a billion dollars a year in expenditures. These large health care organizations are, or should be, modern corporate organizations at least as effective as their counterparts in manufacturing, retailing, or finance. To achieve that goal, they will require managers with comparable ability, motivation, and preparation. The National Summit on The Future Of Health Management and Policy Education emphasized the development of "evidence-based management education" by identifying, prioritizing, and measuring mastery of specific skills, knowledge, and abilities (Griffith 2001). Faculty of Association of University Programs in Health Administration (AUPHA) are working with practitioners to identify and prioritize specific learning competencies at the graduate degree level. Their effort focuses on skills teachable in the classroom, and it is expected to lead to measured performance of graduate school cohorts (Griffith 2001). The purpose of this paper is to pilot test an alternative method to identify competencies and performance of health care executives. Although it deliberately draws competency elements from academic sources, it supplements the teachable skills approach with a questionnaire that asks practitioner respondents to identify the skills and knowledge necessary to manage a specific management event and to evaluate the performance of an anonymous colleague against these skills and knowledge.
医疗保健组织的管理必须加以改进,以应对质量提升和成本控制方面诸多有据可查的挑战。其他行业已经开发出了相关工具——入职教育、指导、规划好的职业生涯中期正规教育与经验,以及针对高级管理人员的特殊项目。本文的目的是对一种用于识别医疗保健高管能力与绩效的替代方法进行试点测试。我们建议使用技术、人际和战略能力的正式清单,以及由受访者选择的特定真实事件来识别能力并确定其优先顺序。对30位大型医疗保健系统首席执行官和15位初入职场者进行的一项试验结果表明,该方法揭示了有关管理者教育需求的有用深度和细节。结果表明,目前对管理教育和学习模式的看法在几个方面可能严重不足。美国医疗保健的持续改善是一个紧迫的国家关切问题。医疗质量差异很大,在许多机构中严重不足(查辛和加尔文,1998年;美国医疗保健质量委员会,2001年)。“质量提升应该是21世纪医疗保健的基本商业战略(凯泽,2001年)。”提高生产率对于平衡来自老龄化人口和不断发展的技术带来的成本压力至关重要(赫弗勒等人,2002年)。熟练的管理对于提高质量和生产率是必要的。通常需要几十名护理人员组成的团队来改善患者的健康状况。为了应对更高的成本、运营和财务的复杂性,以及其他行业规模成功的证据,提供护理服务的组织规模变得更大。虽然仍有许多小型专业诊所、医院和疗养院,但合并已经产生了几十个每年支出超过10亿美元的供应商和中介组织。这些大型医疗保健组织现在是,或者应该是,至少与制造业、零售业或金融业的同行一样高效的现代企业组织。为了实现这一目标,它们将需要具有相当能力、动力和准备的管理者。健康管理与政策教育未来全国峰会强调通过识别、确定优先顺序和衡量对特定技能、知识和能力的掌握程度来发展“基于证据的管理教育”(格里菲思,2001年)。健康管理大学课程协会(AUPHA)的教师正在与从业者合作,以确定研究生阶段特定学习能力的优先顺序。他们的工作重点是课堂上可教授的技能,预计这将导致对研究生群体的表现进行衡量(格里菲思,2001年)。本文的目的是对一种用于识别医疗保健高管能力与绩效的替代方法进行试点测试。尽管它有意从学术来源提取能力要素,但它通过一份问卷对可教授技能方法进行了补充,该问卷要求从业者受访者识别管理特定管理事件所需的技能和知识,并根据这些技能和知识评估一位匿名同事的表现。