Thibault Manon, Blume Warren T, Saint-Hilaire Jean-Marc, Zakhari Rafik, Sommerville Kenneth W
Centre Hospitalier Affilié Enfant Jésus, 1401 18th Street, Quebec, Canada G1J 1Z4.
Epilepsy Res. 2002 Aug;50(3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00048-7.
To compare the safety and efficacy of two formulations of divalproex, extended-release divalproex versus the original divalproex tablet, in adolescent and adult patients with epilepsy.
Eligible patients were between the ages of 12 and 65 years with primary generalized epilepsy, which was controlled over the month prior to study enrollment with divalproex or valproic acid 1000 mg to 2000 mg/day. The patients were well-controlled; 39 of 43 (91%) had no seizures in the previous year. Patients were randomized to receive 84 days of either divalproex two times a day (b.i.d.)/three times a day (t.i.d.) or extended-release divalproex qd and then (crossed over to) 84 days of the comparator formulation. During the two treatment periods, patients received the same daily dose equivalent of divalproex as was taken during the month prior to study entry. The clinical status of patients was evaluated at a screening visit and at four subsequent visits conducted every 42 days.
There was no statistically significant difference between the formulation groups for seizure control rate (95% [41/43] for divalproex and 93% [40/43] for extended-release divalproex). Likewise, the formulation groups were similar based on the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. The most frequently reported (< or =11.4% for either formulation) treatment-related adverse events were asthenia, tremor, nausea, and dizziness.
Extended-release divalproex was similar to divalproex for the treatment of well-controlled, primary generalized epilepsy in terms of overall safety and efficacy parameters.
比较两种双丙戊酸钠制剂,即缓释双丙戊酸钠与原研双丙戊酸钠片,在青少年及成年癫痫患者中的安全性和有效性。
符合条件的患者年龄在12至65岁之间,患有原发性全身性癫痫,在入组研究前一个月使用双丙戊酸钠或丙戊酸1000毫克至2000毫克/天进行控制。患者病情控制良好;43例中有39例(91%)在过去一年无癫痫发作。患者被随机分为两组,一组每日两次(bid)/每日三次(tid)服用双丙戊酸钠,另一组每日一次(qd)服用缓释双丙戊酸钠,为期84天,然后(交叉)服用对照制剂84天。在两个治疗期内,患者接受与入组研究前一个月相同每日剂量等效的双丙戊酸钠。在筛选访视时以及随后每42天进行的四次访视中对患者的临床状况进行评估。
在癫痫控制率方面,两种制剂组之间无统计学显著差异(双丙戊酸钠组为95%[41/43],缓释双丙戊酸钠组为93%[40/43])。同样,基于治疗相关不良事件的发生率,两种制剂组相似。最常报告的(两种制剂均≤11.4%)治疗相关不良事件为乏力、震颤、恶心和头晕。
在总体安全性和有效性参数方面,缓释双丙戊酸钠与双丙戊酸钠在治疗病情控制良好的原发性全身性癫痫方面相似。