Skipp Amy, Windfuhr Kirsten L, Conti-Ramsden Gina
University of Manchester, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2002 Jul-Sep;37(3):253-71. doi: 10.1080/13682820110119214.
The study investigated the development of grammatical categories (noun and verb) in young language learners. Twenty-eight children with specific language impairment (SLI) with a mean language age of 35 months and 28 children with normal language (NL) with a mean language age of 34 months were exposed to four novel verbs and four novel nouns during 10 experimental child-directed play sessions. The lexical items were modelled with four experimentally controlled argument structures. Both groups of children showed little productivity with syntactic marking of arguments in the novel verb conditions. Thus, both groups of children mostly followed the surface structure of the model presented to them, regardless of the argument they were trying to express. Therefore, there was little evidence of verb-general processes. In contrast, both groups used nouns in semantic roles that had not been modelled for them. Importantly, however, children with SLI still appeared to be more input dependent than NL children. This suggests that children with NL were working with a robust noun schema, whereas children with SLI were not. Taken together, the findings suggest that neither group of children had a grammatical category of verb, but demonstrated a general knowledge of the grammatical category of noun. These findings are discussed in relation to current theories of normal and impaired language development.
该研究调查了幼儿语言学习者语法范畴(名词和动词)的发展情况。28名平均语言年龄为35个月的特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童和28名平均语言年龄为34个月的语言正常(NL)儿童,在10次由成人主导的实验性游戏环节中接触了4个新动词和4个新名词。这些词汇项通过4种实验控制的论元结构进行示范。在新动词条件下,两组儿童在对论元进行句法标记方面的产出都很少。因此,两组儿童大多遵循呈现给他们的模型的表层结构,而不管他们试图表达的论元是什么。因此,几乎没有证据表明存在动词通用过程。相比之下,两组儿童都将名词用于未为他们示范过的语义角色。然而,重要的是,SLI儿童似乎仍然比NL儿童更依赖输入。这表明NL儿童使用的是一个强大的名词模式,而SLI儿童则不然。综上所述,研究结果表明,两组儿童都没有动词的语法范畴,但表现出对名词语法范畴的一般了解。本文结合当前关于正常和受损语言发展的理论对这些发现进行了讨论。