Motykiewicz Grazyna, Faraglia Beatrice, Wang Lian Wen, Terry Mary Beth, Senie Ruby T, Santella Regina M
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002;40(2):93-100. doi: 10.1002/em.10095.
The mutagen sensitivity assay is one of the approaches used to investigate individual DNA repair capacity. This method is based on the premise that after in vitro treatment with a test mutagen, DNA from subjects with defective repair will be more damaged than DNA from those with an efficient repair system. However, very little is known about unmeasured processes that occur between cell treatment and final assessment of DNA damage. To develop a more precise assay, we modified the traditional mutagen sensitivity assay to also include measurement of DNA damage after culturing cells in the absence of mutagen. First, we treated apparently normal and xeroderma pigmentosum lymphoblastoid cell lines with various doses of benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) and harvested cells at different time points. A polyclonal antiserum against BPDE-DNA was used to quantitate levels of adducts by immunoslot-blot and immunohistochemistry. Selected conditions included treatment with 10 microM BPDE, a 4-hr culture in mutagen-free medium, and immunohistochemical measurement of BPDE-DNA adducts. The method was then applied in a pilot study to 50 lymphoblastoid lines from sisters discordant for breast cancer. There was no significant difference between cases and controls in the level of BPDE-DNA adducts in lymphoblasts harvested immediately after BPDE treatment. However, after a 4-hr culture in mutagen-free medium, the level of adducts was significantly higher (P = 0.006) among cases than in controls. There was a two-fold increase in mean adduct removal in lines from nonaffected as compared to affected sisters (44% and 22% decrease, respectively). DNA repair capacity was predictive of case status (P = 0.04) in logistic regression analysis. This method, which can be easily applied to large numbers of samples, should be useful in studies to investigate the role of DNA repair in cancer risk.
诱变剂敏感性测定是用于研究个体DNA修复能力的方法之一。该方法基于这样一个前提:在用测试诱变剂进行体外处理后,修复缺陷受试者的DNA将比具有高效修复系统者的DNA受到更严重的损伤。然而,对于细胞处理和DNA损伤最终评估之间发生的未测量过程知之甚少。为了开发一种更精确的测定方法,我们对传统的诱变剂敏感性测定进行了改进,使其还包括在无诱变剂条件下培养细胞后对DNA损伤的测量。首先,我们用不同剂量的苯并(a)芘二醇环氧化物(BPDE)处理外观正常的和着色性干皮病淋巴母细胞系,并在不同时间点收获细胞。使用针对BPDE-DNA的多克隆抗血清通过免疫印迹和免疫组织化学法定量加合物水平。选定的条件包括用10 microM BPDE处理、在无诱变剂培养基中培养4小时以及对BPDE-DNA加合物进行免疫组织化学测量。然后将该方法应用于一项初步研究,研究对象为50个来自患乳腺癌情况不一致的姐妹的淋巴母细胞系。在BPDE处理后立即收获的淋巴细胞中,病例组和对照组的BPDE-DNA加合物水平没有显著差异。然而,在无诱变剂培养基中培养4小时后,病例组的加合物水平显著高于对照组(P = 0.006)。与受影响姐妹的细胞系相比,未受影响姐妹的细胞系中平均加合物清除率增加了两倍(分别下降44%和22%)。在逻辑回归分析中,DNA修复能力可预测病例状态(P = 0.04)。这种方法可以很容易地应用于大量样本,在研究DNA修复在癌症风险中的作用时应该会很有用。