Borowsky Iris Wagman, Ireland Marjorie
Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Pediatrics. 2002 Sep;110(3):509-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.509.
To ascertain and compare the knowledge, practices, and training needs of pediatricians and family physicians regarding intimate partner violence screening and intervention.
Surveys were mailed to national random samples of 1350 pediatricians and 650 family physicians evenly divided between senior residents, practitioners completing their residency training within the last 5 years, and practitioners completing their training >5 years ago.
The overall response rate was 37% (41% for pediatricians, 30% for family physicians). Among practicing physicians, only 8% of family physicians and 5% of pediatricians routinely screened a parent for intimate partner violence during well-child and teen visits. Family medicine residents were significantly more likely to routinely screen for intimate partner violence (18%), whereas pediatric residents were not (7%). All groups demonstrated deficits in knowledge of appropriate management of situations of domestic abuse; for example, over 60% of family medicine and 75% of pediatric residents and practitioners agreed with the inappropriate response of always urging a woman to leave her abusive partner immediately. Many physicians indicated a need for more information about domestic violence, ranging from 40% of family medicine residents to 72% of pediatric residents. Residency training and continuing medical education in the prevention of child/adolescent violence and having an office protocol for managing cases involving domestic violence increased the likelihood of parental screening for intimate partner violence.
Few child and adolescent primary care physicians routinely screen parents for intimate partner violence and most need more information on this topic. Residency training and continuing medical education on violence prevention, including screening and intervention skills in intimate partner violence, and office protocols for managing cases of domestic violence could increase screening rates.
确定并比较儿科医生和家庭医生在亲密伴侣暴力筛查及干预方面的知识、做法和培训需求。
向全国随机抽取的1350名儿科医生和650名家庭医生邮寄调查问卷,这些医生在高级住院医师、过去5年内完成住院医师培训的从业者以及5年多以前完成培训的从业者中平均分配。
总体回复率为37%(儿科医生为41%,家庭医生为30%)。在执业医生中,只有8%的家庭医生和5%的儿科医生在儿童健康检查和青少年就诊时常规筛查父母是否遭受亲密伴侣暴力。家庭医学住院医师常规筛查亲密伴侣暴力的可能性显著更高(18%),而儿科住院医师则不然(7%)。所有组在家庭虐待情况的适当管理知识方面均存在不足;例如,超过60%的家庭医学住院医师以及75%的儿科住院医师和从业者赞同总是敦促女性立即离开施虐伴侣这种不恰当的应对方式。许多医生表示需要更多关于家庭暴力的信息,从40%的家庭医学住院医师到72%的儿科住院医师不等。预防儿童/青少年暴力方面的住院医师培训和继续医学教育以及制定处理家庭暴力案件的办公室协议增加了对父母进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查的可能性。
很少有儿童和青少年初级保健医生常规筛查父母是否遭受亲密伴侣暴力,且大多数医生需要更多关于该主题的信息。包括亲密伴侣暴力筛查和干预技能在内的预防暴力方面的住院医师培训和继续医学教育以及处理家庭暴力案件的办公室协议可提高筛查率。