Baughman Reagan, Dickert-Conlin Stacy, Houser Scott
Health Policy Program, University of Michigan, 109 Observatory, SPHII-M2234, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
Demography. 2002 Aug;39(3):455-65. doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0024.
Cohabitation is an alternative to marriage and to living independently for an increasing number of Americans. Still, research that explores links between living arrangements and economic behavior is limited by a lack of data that explicitly identify cohabiting couples. To aid researchers in using the Survey of Income and Program Participation's (SIPP) rich data to explore cohabitation issues, we consider direct and inferred measures of cohabitation. We find, first, that the use of inferred definitions (relative to direct measures) in the SIPP is likely to yield higher cohabitation rates in the United States by incorrectly coding roommates as cohabitors. Second, the SIPP (whether by direct or inferred measures) counts a significantly larger number of cohabiting couples than the widely used Current Population Survey (CPS). Third, spells of cohabitation occur less frequently and last longer when a direct measure of cohabitation is used than when either of the two inferred measures of cohabitation is used; ours is the first article to reveal this result.
对于越来越多的美国人来说,同居是婚姻和独立生活之外的另一种选择。然而,由于缺乏能够明确识别同居伴侣的数据,探索生活安排与经济行为之间联系的研究受到了限制。为了帮助研究人员利用收入与项目参与调查(SIPP)的丰富数据来探讨同居问题,我们考虑了同居的直接测量方法和推断测量方法。我们首先发现,在SIPP中使用推断定义(相对于直接测量方法)可能会通过将室友错误编码为同居者而导致美国的同居率更高。其次,SIPP(无论是通过直接测量还是推断测量)统计的同居伴侣数量比广泛使用的当前人口调查(CPS)要多得多。第三,与使用两种推断同居测量方法中的任何一种相比,使用同居的直接测量方法时,同居期出现的频率更低,持续时间更长;我们的文章是第一篇揭示这一结果的。