Cote Kimberly A, De Lugt Duncan R, Campbell Kenneth B
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Psychophysiology. 2002 Jan;39(1):29-37. doi: 10.1017/S0048577202992188.
Event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responsiveness were investigated during the transition from wakefulness to sleep. Ten participants were presented with an auditory oddball task during repeated sleep onset periods. The EEG was recorded from 29 different scalp sites. A 1500-Hz tone pip was presented infrequently (p = .04) within a series of lower pitch 1000-Hz "standard" stimuli (p = .96). Participants were required to button press upon detection of the rare "target" stimulus. During wakefulness, almost all targets were detected. A large amplitude P300 was observed to these detected targets. This P300 was maximum over parietal areas of the scalp. During stage 1 sleep, subjects continued to respond on 47% of trials. The parietal P300 amplitude remained large to these detected targets. It was, however, much attenuated at frontal sites. When the participant failed to detect the target in either stage 1 or 2, no P300 was visible. P300 is thus associated with behavioral detection of the target stimulus, whether in wakefulness or stage 1 "sleep." Trials were also sorted by reaction time (RT), in which bins 1-3 represented increasingly long RT. In the waking state, P300 amplitude did not significantly vary across the different bins. Although mean RT latency varied by 512 ms from bin 1 to bin 3, P300 latency varied by only 25 ms. Differences in RT are thus probably due to response-related processes rather than stimulus classification time.
在从清醒到睡眠的过渡过程中,对事件相关电位(ERP)和行为反应性进行了研究。十名参与者在反复入睡期间接受了听觉oddball任务。脑电图从29个不同的头皮部位进行记录。在一系列较低音调的1000赫兹“标准”刺激(p = 0.96)中,不频繁地呈现1500赫兹的音调短声(p = 0.04)。要求参与者在检测到罕见的“目标”刺激时按下按钮。在清醒状态下,几乎所有目标都能被检测到。对这些检测到的目标观察到一个大振幅的P300。这个P300在头皮顶叶区域最大。在第一阶段睡眠期间,受试者在47%的试验中继续做出反应。顶叶P300振幅对这些检测到的目标仍然很大。然而,在额叶部位它大大减弱。当参与者在第一阶段或第二阶段未能检测到目标时,没有可见的P300。因此,P300与目标刺激的行为检测有关,无论是在清醒状态还是第一阶段“睡眠”中。试验也按反应时间(RT)进行分类,其中第1 - 3组代表反应时间越来越长。在清醒状态下,不同组之间P300振幅没有显著差异。尽管从第1组到第3组平均RT潜伏期相差512毫秒,但P300潜伏期仅相差25毫秒。因此,RT的差异可能是由于与反应相关的过程而不是刺激分类时间。