Röggla Martin, Frossard Martin, Wagner Andreas, Holzer Michael, Bur Andreas, Röggla Georg
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Clinics of Vienna, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 May 15;114(8-9):315-20.
The optimal rewarming technique for patients in deep accidental hypothermia with core temperatures below 28 degrees C is not established. Several authors believe that extracorporeal rewarming is essential, especially for patients with hemodynamic instability. Others believe that invasive rewarming ought to be reserved for patients in cardiac arrest. We describe our experience with a strictly conservative technique without the use of invasive rewarming devices in patients with severe accidental hypothermia and a sustained perfusion rhythm.
A cohort study extending from 1991 to 2000, including all patients received at the emergency department of the University Hospital of Vienna with severe hypothermia, a core temperature of maximum 28 degrees C and no preclinical cardiac arrest.
36 patients with deep hypothermia were included in the study. Their core temperatures ranged from 20.2 degrees C to 28 degrees C; the median temperature was 25.75 degrees C (25th and 75th percentile, 24.2/27.3). Fourteen patients were intoxicated and their multimorbidity was high. All of 19 patients with stable hemodynamics and 14 of 17 patients with unstable hemodynamics were successfully rewarmed to normothermia with warmed infusions, inhalation rewarming and forced air rewarming. The rewarming process took 9.5 hours (8/10.5) and required a volume load of 4820 ml (2735/5770). The rewarming rate was 1.09 degrees C per hour (0.94/1.25). Although 92% of the patients were successfully rewarmed to normothermia, in-hospital mortality was 42%, but was largely related to comorbidity.
A conservative approach is highly successful in achieving normothermia in patients with deep hypothermia with or without stable hemodynamics. In-hospital mortality of severe accidental hypothermia in urban conditions is high; comorbidity might play a major role. The influence of the rewarming strategy on late in-hospital mortality remains unclear.
对于核心体温低于28摄氏度的意外深度低温患者,最佳复温技术尚未确立。一些作者认为体外复温至关重要,特别是对于血流动力学不稳定的患者。另一些人则认为侵入性复温应仅用于心脏骤停患者。我们描述了在严重意外低温且有持续灌注节律的患者中,不使用侵入性复温设备的严格保守技术的经验。
一项从1991年至2000年的队列研究,纳入了维也纳大学医院急诊科收治的所有严重低温、核心体温最高28摄氏度且无临床前心脏骤停的患者。
36例深度低温患者纳入研究。他们的核心体温范围为20.2摄氏度至28摄氏度;中位体温为25.75摄氏度(第25和第75百分位数,24.2/27.3)。14例患者中毒,且合并多种疾病。19例血流动力学稳定的患者和17例血流动力学不稳定的患者中的14例通过温热输液、吸入复温和强制空气复温成功复温至正常体温。复温过程耗时9.5小时(8/10.5),需要4820毫升(2735/5770)的容量负荷。复温速率为每小时1.09摄氏度(0.94/1.25)。尽管92%的患者成功复温至正常体温,但院内死亡率为42%,但很大程度上与合并症有关。
对于有或无稳定血流动力学的深度低温患者,保守方法在实现正常体温方面非常成功。城市环境中严重意外低温的院内死亡率很高;合并症可能起主要作用。复温策略对后期院内死亡率的影响仍不清楚。